Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
Lol. I don't think you understand how this all works. Do you think it'd be higher or lower with 100% of people working for them supporting what they want?
There's a very real and useful tactic called malicious compliance, where you do what's written but not what's intended, to slow down the machinery. It's a useful tactic, but you need people on the inside to do that.
If you still want them to leave after reading this, I'm assuming you're on their side. You want them to leave to make room for obedient workers. If so, fuck off. You're too easy to read.
Am I talking to a robot, or do you blatantly ignore the fact that ICE accelerated it's “machinery” after 2025, and that malicious compliance is having the opposite effect, as I replied to you back?
How can you know it's having the opposite effect if they're accelerating their machinery? The result could easily just be the acceleration from increased spending and recruitment being more powerful than the malicious compliance.
If they leave, do you think those jobs remain vacant? Obviously not. They fill them with new employees, who will probably be sycophants. They'll be happy to do the job as desired and make things worse.
Because effectively “They [have] fill them with new […] sycophants. They’ll be happy to do the job as desired and make things worse.” It's 2026, they’ve point blank executed 9 people in Minnesota, a Blue state.
Alright, I'm done. I moving on. I don't know if you're actually just trying to help them or if you're so set in your stupid idiology to realize that you're helping them. Everyone getting out of their way is what they want. Malicious compliance has been used historically to great effect to slow down authoritarian regimes. If you can't recognize that then you aren't arguing in good faith.
prove it.
This has some examples against the Nazis. It's been used many more places too.
I suggest you researc before you are so sure that you're correct. You're closing yourself off to learning new things because you think you already know the answer.
Teslas are helping the Nazis.
Boeing too.
U-haul as well.
Ford, Cheveron, and all the Americans automotive makers are not doing malicious compliance (MC).
Sure, the companies are not. They are in support of the regime, so why would they? They probably have employees who are though. You wouldn't know until after this is all done and they come out and say it. The entire point is to keep it descrete so you can continue doing it. You can't do it if they fire you.
They are “descretely” accelerating the genocide of fascism🤦♀️. Since you can't see that, the conversation is over.
Dude, this conversation was about workers, not companies. You're so dense.
The sycophants exceed the “Schindlers” in our current moment. The companies have outpaced them.
No shit. I literally said the sycophants are the problem. You want to make room for more by having the people slowing things down leave. Do you even remember what we were talking about?
You don't seem to comprehend my point. So I’ll draw it for you.
