this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
475 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27087 readers
1872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Primary these worthless fucks

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Someone needs to run against him in order to be primaried.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes. And I'm calling for that to happen.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

No need to wait. The elected Democrats can vote them out of their leadership positions now.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Good idea. Should we vote for another Dem who will do the same shit? Or for a hard R who will do even worse?

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about a Progressive that will actually listen to us?

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We tried that in 2016 when we elected Bernie Sanders as our Dem candidate. The DNC told us to go fuck ourselves and nominated Hillary Clinton anyway. So, no, apparently that won't work either.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Times have changed. They can fight all they want. Like they did against Mamdani, and they lost.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You, voters have demonstrated that they are now ready to run rough-shod over the establishment.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You apparently don't understand what it means to primary a candidate (from the left, in this case). I'll explain it for you. The way to get more progressive people in Congress is to primary the existing congresspeople with a more progressive candidate.

Whoever wins the Dem primary in this district will win in the general. It does no good to wait until the general to just vote against the republican and get Jeffries again. You have to find and support a good progressive candidate who is to the left of Jeffries and beat him in the primary. If that doesn't happen, no one is going to even bother running against Jeffries because they know they won't beat him in the primary. People have to support support support an opponent.

This is how magats took over Congress. They primaried the hell out of the "traditional" repubs, from the right. They won some of those primaries and lost some. Then sometimes they still lost in the general if their candidate was too far to the right for their district. But they didn't care because they still won in a lot of others. They kept doing this every election, and the more power the right got in Congress, the more trad repubs just dropped out and didn't even try to win re-election. Once it gets going it snowballs.

There's no reason the left can't do the exact same thing to the Dems as the right did to the repubs. Well, unless it's already too late now that maga controls the government, that is.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. Because they don’t have the same networks, relationships etc.