this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
462 points (96.0% liked)

Greentext

7776 readers
1157 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Again about this? McD shills have nothing better to do than infiltrate 4Chan now?

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 month ago (6 children)

McDonald's isn't good food, nor is it good for you, byt being disingenuous in what is supposed to be a documentary is also not good. Calling out a liar doesn't mean you're a shill for the one who's being lied about.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Sure sure. But he got his point across which seems to require drama, more than scientific accuracy, to reach the target demo. And I'm pretty sure on that front, mission accomplished : McD had to bend over from the public outcry.

So again : who the fuck benefits from telling us, again and again from what I've seen in the last few months, that he wasn't scientifically accurate and a paragon of intellectual integrity, despite his message being right?

Hmm, this approach feels so familiar...

[–] corbin 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wasn't "mission accomplished," there was essentially no difference between the Supersize meals that were discontinued and the large meals that still exist to this day. The movie achieved no positive goals for the general public, and (arguably) helped solidify the general public's perception that fat people wouldn't be fat anymore if they stopped going to McDonalds.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)