this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
575 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27087 readers
3310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

there is no current word on their condition as the situation is evolving, but i am expecting both to be dead and hope to be wrong. either way, ICE nazis are committed to upholding fascism at the expense of human lives. we are more unsafe now than we’ve been before in this administration. ICE does not view any of us as exceptions. we will be slaughtered if Der Führer demands it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Well that didn't take long, how long before this is found to be lies top to bottom?

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 140 points 3 days ago (4 children)

'Weaponized their vehicle' seems to be ICE's favorite excuse per some stat I saw earlier in the day...

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

Doesn't matter what you do, they'll claim you were a threat...

The only exception is carrying a big fuck off rifle yourself, because then you're actually a threat.

I've never seen a video or heard of an event where American law enforcement murdered a civilian while sympathetic protesters carrying rifles were within line of sight.

We all know they're cowards. We'd be stupid not to do the one thing that prevents overreach.

Bunch of tootsie pops running around talking about an owl infestation, you only get licked a couple times till you get cracked

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It makes sense, no different from if they were arresting people in kitchens and claiming they had a knife

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

If I were better with AI I’d add ICE uniforms and masks.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Although the victim was allegedly heard to have said that they were simply "blowing their nose," the ICE agent on-scene assessed that the domestic terrorist foreign gang member was actually about to weaponize the Kleenex, and shot the evil libtard in the face six times in self-defence.

[–] doopen@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I feel like they inherently lose any legitimacy when using emotive language like "vicious" in official statements from a public body

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

They lost legitimacy about 12 months ago when the CROTUS (child rapist of the united states) installed loyalists despite their lack of experience or truthfulness.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yup, it's an immediate red flag that you're dealing with propaganda rather than actual reporting. So gross to see official US government statements being written like a 4chan post. So it goes with fascists.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The base isn't going to rile itsself. Well, I guess they do, but you get where I'm going with this.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

this is contributing to the false narrative that ICE is legitimate. they aren’t. they should have never been established and must be abolished. not only that but their current iteration is acting on illegal orders by a fascist dictator president. even if what they’re saying is true it doesn’t justify their actions because they shouldn’t fucking be there in the first place.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

they should have never been established and must be abolished.

It's wild how many people legitimately don't know it didn't exist 25 years ago...

Like, obviously we don't need it, it's practically brand new for a federal agency. The only reason it's as big as it is, is we e been rotating between neoliberals and republicans for 30 years, while both groups moved right.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's an entire agency that is 90% staffed with tactical units enforcing MISDEMEANOR civil infractions that the supreme court gave unlimited authority because their scope of work was narrow to the limit where normal people shouldn't ever encounter them.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I mean, TECHNICALLY correct. Prior to 2003 ICE was called INS. They were around since 1933:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/immigration_and_naturalization_service_(ins)

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"fearing for his life", unfortunately they're all about to understand what that really means if things get more out of hand across the country

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ikies@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Anything I don't like is "Tren de aragua" related

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

They fear not getting a chance to kill a minority.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Its not a lie, there's a formal point system to determine whether someone is associated with Tren de Aragua. 8 points means they're definitely a part of the gang.

It's 3 points for being in the US without documentation, 6 points for associating with any known members and 2 points for any social media posts containing "associated references".

Practically every Venezuelan is part of the gang according to the DoJ. So it's not a lie, just guilt by association.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It is a lie, it's just a lie built on a system designed to lie. No rational person who is genuinely seeking to understand whether or not someone is a member of that gang would read that list and agree with it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When are they going to arrest the kiddie rapist and human trafficker in the White House?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not while he's in office, they already established that...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Nor will they ever. If we ever get to a Nazi-purging stage Trump will be long gone by then.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

It’s always some excuse

[–] someone@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

could be true, could be false. ICE has lost all credibility and blatantly makes shit up. Is this a time when they are being honest or is this more made up shit? who knows, but probably more bullshit

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Our mayor nailed it in his statement:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/2-shot-federal-agents-portland-sources/story?id=129038573

"Portland Mayor Keith Wilson told reporters, "We know what the federal government says happened here. There was a time when we could take them at their word. That time is long past.""

[–] someone@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago