this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
1436 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

8906 readers
290 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The only thing stopping Trump right now is the courts.

Stopping him how?

but once the court actually steps up and tells him to stop, he does.

Like when? And what good is telling him to stop after he's already done the thing? What's to stop him from just defying it again?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm referring to things like this:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/31/donald-trump-national-guard-deployment-00708714

You may think it's ineffective, but it's why we're not staring down the barrel of a tank right now.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let me know if I'm summarizing this fairly:

Your concern with people open-carrying at ICE protests is that it risks creating a situation where Trump can declare Martial Law. If that happens, he could use bombs against civilians, with no way for the courts to tell him to stop.

You agree that there is nothing stopping him from using tanks and bombs on civilians right now, but if he does, the courts will tell him to stop at some point in the future. And he probably would, but then he would come back later, probably with more weaponry.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now that's a whole lot of stuff I didn't say. You wanted to know how Martial Law would be different than what we've got now, and I gave you the answer.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can quote everything I included in that summary if you give me examples of things you think you didn't say.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You assume I'm against open carry, for one.

I also disagree with your entire second paragraph. Something is clearly stopping him from bombing us right now, and you seem to be suggesting that it's not the courts, it's... his own goodwill? What?

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You assume I’m against open carry, for one.

You're right, I got mixed up with this thread and another -- this is about opening fire.

I also disagree with your entire second paragraph. Something is clearly stopping him from bombing us right now, and you seem to be suggesting that it’s not the courts, it’s… his own goodwill? What?

That's a false premise. Just because he isn't doing something doesn't mean he's prevented from doing it.

You could have said exactly the same thing about deploying the national guard to those states before he did it, and we can see that you would have been wrong.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Except, America has always fucked around with foreign leaders, so I wouldn't have said that. We've done a number of coups without congressional approval in my lifetime, the only remarkable thing about Maduro is that we took him alive.

In the same lifetime, we have never deployed troops to local neighborhoods.

Edit: you ninja edited me.

I also wouldn't have said the same thing about deploying national guard to those states, because that's also happened multiple times before Trump.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I envy your comfort in the guardrails and ability to rationalize Trump as behaving more-or-less within the bounds of precedence.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plan for the worst, hope for the best.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd love to see some of that planning actually happen.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Come to my community meetings and help us set up a mutual aid network.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've been looking into organizations in my area, Rotary seems interesting -- but I have this nagging suspicion someone is going to link me to why they're actually problematic.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rotary can be good, but they lean more progressive lib than left left. They do have a lot of helpful programs for the community though.

Honestly, grassroots groups are popping up all over the place, and you can't even find them online yet. We didn't even have a website before I volunteered space, and I only found them by going to protests and talking to people there. There's one coming up at 2pm on Tuesday the 20th, so you're gonna find the ones willing to leave work early at that one.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nothing wrong with being progressive lib. Not fond of most self-described left-left leaning people I meet anyways (at least on fedi). So maybe I'll look into it more.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

lmao, yeah I feel you on the fediverse left. I promise we're not all like that offline too, gotta have practical praxis IRL.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

See my edit, I deliberately changed my example the moment I posted it because I knew you'd say that.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago