this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
797 points (99.8% liked)

News

34088 readers
4124 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Film critics can throw peanuts from the peanut gallery but nobody actually cares what they think if they don't show they can make something better or even elucidate how to improve on the current script.

I'm not saying they can't make such comments; but as a call to action? In terms of obvious suggestive stochastic rhetoric? That's Chamberlain talk. Plain and simple.

In a way, it's like they're preaching to a choir of fellow critics who all agree the film sucks. But they don't offer any substantive way to improve it. Instead they just cry and complain to other film critics to find a way to make it better, or just keep yelling at the director to do something. Nobody likes these people.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is your requirements and not the rest of ours. I have watched critics not add anything, we are empathetic creatures, sometimes we want to know how others feel, not just what they think.

I am honestly fine with people crying about it being bad and preaching to the choir cause it makes for a more full sounding song.

I dont require everyone that says anything to always be productive and I would ask you to ask yourself why you think that is normal to require from everyone else.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nope, not me. I am not fine with falsely equating film critics analyzing a film already completed to stochastic antagonists prodding what has yet to come.

Besides, like I said even if we entertain this false analogy, in a way, it's like they're preaching to a choir of fellow critics who all agree the film sucks. But they don't offer any substantive way to improve it. Instead they just cry and complain to other film critics to find a way to make it better, or just keep yelling at the director to do something. Nobody likes these people.