this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
477 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27097 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A separate judge had ruled that Halligan, who brought cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, was unlawfully appointed.

A federal judge Tuesday ordered Trump ally Lindsey Halligan to explain why she continues to call herself the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia even though another judge determined in November that she had been unlawfully appointed to the position.

U.S. District Judge David Novak of Richmond issued a three-page order demanding to know why Halligan is still serving in the post. Halligan, who unsuccessfully prosecuted former FBI Direct James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, is also referred to as U.S. attorney by the Justice Department in official documents.

The judge's order is unusual because he issued it on his own, not at the request of defense attorneys. It came in a case involving a carjacking and attempted bank robbery suspect who was indicted last month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 161 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

fucking arrest her and put her in jail wtf is going on

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

See your honor..... We've run into a problem. They actually don't even make jails for rich white women.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah they do, it's the one Ghislaine Maxwell is in. The one that's basically a regular house that you can't leave.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Tbf she's not actually wealthy. Her father was at one point, but his business empire collapsed into debt. She's just a heiress with no inheritance who had lots of connections with wealthy people.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Afaik she's worth at least 5m. Which, that sounds rich to me.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That’s not all that rich. Which is probably why she’s in prison.

Where I live, a single family home costs well over a million dollars. Two million in a “nice” neighborhood. Take the rest of that and put it in a diversified brokerage account, you can probably make enough each month to live as if you had a regular middle class job but without working. I wouldn’t call that “rich.” That’s basically just early retirement.

Sure would be nice though.

[–] vardogor@mander.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

dude. if you have SEVEN digits, ~15x the average annual income, to spend on a home and still have enough to never work again, you are rich

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Oh, sorry, I meant Halligan. Yeah no you’re probably right about Maxwell, idk.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

If she's got a penny, she's got millions squirrelled away somewhere. She was Epstein for years, and he had billions. Surely he siphoned some to her as well. And a guy like Epstein definitely knows how to hide money in Cayman, or Bahamian, or Swiss, etc. banks.

There's a whole other branch of the Epstein case that is seldom mentioned: the financial case. There's an investigation into the money trails, and that's could lead to more actionable information than all the gossipy stuff we've seen so far.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

She has a wealth of knowledge relating to the wealthy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

Which makes her part of that class

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maxwell has been complimentary of her prison saying "the staff is very responsive..."

Staff. Responsive. Fuck. Me.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

That's hilarious, because when I was in jail the staff wasn't even responsive when I had a medical emergency...

[–] greasewizard@slrpnk.net 38 points 5 days ago

have her explain from a jail cell

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Rule of law for thee but not for me