474
Trump admin says it’s cutting welfare funds to blue states over alleged Minnesota fraud
(www.huffpost.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
474 points (99.4% liked)
politics
27097 readers
2550 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The executive doesn't have that unilateral authority. What he's doing is illegal; unconstitutional, even.
"No taxation without representation" ring any bells?
He can do whatever he wants. No one is stopping him. Your system needs to be torn down and rebuilt.
Is that you volunteering to throw the first brick?
I'm not allowed into your country, so I'm not really sure how to help you with that
Bummer dude, it's a shithole here. You're not missing much. Many of us want out.
Laws don't fucking matter when the systems that hold the corrupt accountable have been subverted by the very corrupt they meant to police.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't call it out. Don't let them dominate the narrative with their "might makes right" rhetoric.
If Trump's actions are illegal or unconstitutional, the reason is not related to "No taxation without representation." Minnesota has representation in the Senate and in the House.
Wrong. By unilaterally withholding congressionally-allocated tax funds (which is unconstitutional), he's using executive power to bypass Congress.
In other words, the representational branch of the US government is being boxed out of their constitutional duty to allocate federal funds. The people's elected representatives are not having the final say on how that tax money is being distributed, as the constitution prescribes.
The people are still paying taxes. Their elected representatives are being bypassed (unconstitutionally) by the executive, who is unilaterally withholding congressionally-allocated tax funds. That is not what it means to have representation.
He is not wrong.
Yes, he is. Congressional representation being bypassed by unilateral executive overreach is effectively the same thing as "no representation."
Having the authority is inversely proportional to the rest of the government having a spine.
They’re spineless, so he has the authority.
What authority he has is spelled out in the constitution, and the authority to do what he's doing is given to Congress. Doing it without congressional approval is unconstitutional.
Congress and the judiciary being spineless or complicit doesn't confer authority. It might give him the leeway to overstep his authority, but that doesn't change the fact that he doesn't have the authority.
Let's not muddy the waters. He would love for you to believe he does have the authority.
Yeah…my comment was obviously not intended to withstand legal scrutiny. You took it way too seriously. For the record - constitutionality is not a factor in restraining this president.
I know you meant it to be humorous. If I thought you were seriously trying to claim that he has the authority, my response would have been much sharper and likely gotten me banned.
That being said, I disagree that I took it too seriously. I take it very seriously. It's a serious matter. I believe we must be firm and clear about that.
And I understand that so far he seems to be getting away with flagrantly violating the constitution at every turn. That pisses me off to no end. But it doesn't change the fact that he is subject to the restraints imposed by the constitution. He has no legal basis for disregarding it, and I won't mince words about that. Nor will I joke about it.
It's already bad enough that he's getting away with it. Let's not pretend that means he's actually allowed to do anything he wants.
I really don’t know why you’re trying to argue with me. It’s not like I disagree. Feel free to soapbox all you want, I guess.
And if nobody does anything then yes he has the authority. Didn't someone in your government just say might makes right about taking over Greenland.
That’s going to be tough, some pretty serious weather and not much there until you “drill baby drill”
Canada on the other hand has lots of nice places to live and work. If he invades Canada, I’ll bet he gets lots of volunteers …. To march across the border and petition for asylum
That's not what authority is.
And don't pretend the inane drivel that comes out of steven miller's mouth constitutes valid legal rationale.