this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
News
51 readers
1 users here now
Breaking news and current events worldwide.
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"Manufacturers of period products have previously used saline or water to measure how absorbent they are. Menstrual blood, however, is much thicker than water, and contains endometrial tissue, mucus and other secretions, and is therefore absorbed at a different rate, according to the paper.
"No study exists comparing the capacity of currently available menstrual hygiene products using blood," the study's authors wrote. "Utilizing actual menstrual blood to test the collection capacity of menstrual hygiene products would be challenging, but blood products are a closer approximation than water or saline.""
There might be studies that used blood far in the past for no longer used period products. But no modern product study seems to have used actual blood, just water, saline, or occasionally a liquid solution with other components added to it, such as hemoglobin.
There appears to be no industry standard for such testing except for tampons.
NIST needs to step up their game.