this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
547 points (99.1% liked)
People Twitter
8906 readers
243 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There isn't likely to be a good reason for each light to be individually controlled instead of having one switch for all six.
Don't get me wrong, lights could be put in multiple groups (ambient lighting, task lighting, etc.) but six of them is more than a stretch.
Could be three types of lighting divided into two spacial zones. Might be commercial (or industrial) where it's nice to have all the switches by the door to turn everything off at once (but still have the option of only lighting one half if that's where all the work is being done that day).
Maybe they sometimes want only some of them on and haven't heard of dimmer switches?
I don't think it's all that uncommon to see in houses with recessed light fixtures, 1970s-90s type stuff. Couple 3-ways for hallway lights (also controlled elsewhere in the hallways), 1 (or 2) for ceiling fan (2 if it has lights and wired as such), rest for banks of recessed lights so someone could use lower wattage incandescents in some. I think this nonsense mostly died out with shag carpeting tho