this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
581 points (97.7% liked)
Just Post
1230 readers
22 users here now
Just post something π
Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.
Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.
Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh god, another time I see that cat killing birds statistics.
Yes, simplified thinking here led to Mao killing off sparrow to protect crops only for those crops to be eaten by insects that otherwise would have been managed by said sparrowsβ¦
There's no denying that outdoor cats kill birds but you're right that those numbers are inflated. Plus, the problem with looking back 70-100 years back isn't just methodology but it's the fact that stray and feral cats are much better maintained in the last few decades. It's a problem many counties actually bothered to tackle with high profile neutering campaigns and such. So, I bet the numbers are probably lower than collisions at this point.
Context also matters a lot-- cats are, like us, an invasive species. The most evidence of it being a problem are in places where there were no major predators for birds (mostly thinking of islands like New Zealand). But that's less a matter of bird deaths so much as a matter of man made ecological changes leading to endangerment.
It's also weird how much easier it should be to just not have clear glass skyscrapers murdering thousands of birds vs what, killing off cats? What even is the end game to that statistic, lol.
I think it's to show that bird deaths from turbines is insignificant
Thank you! I have been puzzled about that for years.
https://old.lemmy.world/comment/21386013
This sounds like the type of denial one hears from. climate change deniers except with cats instead.
Just say you have outdoor cats and refuse to accept anything that says it's bad.
I don't have a cat. Nor a dog. I do have a book on bird watching and binoculars though.
No need to be an asshole. There is a large cultural difference between the US and EU on this issue. Expert opinion is also divided, of low quality and influenced by local opinion.
Americans tend to think in moral absolutes about everything, and from their moral absolutism have an unwavering delusional confidence that they are 'correct' because of their feelings. It's why we are so backwards in so many ways.
Birds good, cats bad. Full stop. If you don't agree you are evil and clearly support bird genocide!
No other possibility is allowed in the discussion, like understanding that systems are complex and/or that not all cats are the same, or that the studies often quoted on these issues are flawed and problematic in many ways. And that the general solution to the problem... the control of the feral cat population, is one both 'sides' already agree on. Because there is no 'drama' in that. It's much more dramatic to scream at every cat owner they are a evil person if they allow their cat outside at any time ever.
Given I see it the same as climate denial, I see no reason not to be an asshole to either type of a anti-science tomfoolery.
People are taking this really personally, the chart isn't even throwing shade at cats. It's saying look how small this is compared to something basically no one cares about in the US. Domestic and the resulting feral cats are a human created invasive species issue that way worse and more destructive than we give it credit for because we love cats.
I'm tangentially involved enough in local spay/neuter programs and you can see these consequences locally wherever you live.
Like I love cats, I have 4 indoor, no outdoor animals, but people are really trying to act like feral cat predation is no big deal. It is a huge deal, we just don't care, and if we don't care about a billion birds getting killed by cats, and a quarter billion by windows, why the hell would we care about the 7 that windmills killed in comparison.
Wind turbines kill as many birds in the US as the feral cats in my COUNTY do.
So what's your take on my comment here:
https://old.lemmy.world/comment/21386013
One desd bird doesn't mean it only killed one. Also, the other comments that it's feral cats is spot on.
One concern is well fed outdoor cats normalized people who have feral cats , especially the kinds they dump a bag of food every now and then and think they mean they aren't part of the problem.
And in general, people should not allow their pets outside. We do it for cats but not other animals because people think their cats is never a nuisance; bird killer or otherwise.
All the science says don't let your cat out. Pointing at one specific stat and ripping it apart and claiming victory is exactly how we allowed climate change to just slip away for over 60 years now.
It's not a problem if I dump some motor oil into the ground because oil tankers leaker more! Either too contribute or too don't and I'm going to be a dick to anyone that contributes no matter how little.
Not really, no.
Cat wellbeing doesn't say that. Cat depression rates in high enriched indoor environments neither. Keeping the cat indoors is like keeping the people forced to stay in home during Covid - it has negative wellbeing consequences.
What the heck are you talking about? What stat? There are studies that show that the cats kill mostly rodents (Lowes et al.), and that average bird prey is old or sick. The biggest problem with bird population dropping is not invasive cat species, but invasive human species.
Bird loss is a function of habitat shrinking, climat change, pesticides and pollution. Any fix must focus on that instead of a cheap scapegoat. Do you know how I can tell that? Because the birds are dropping world wide (over 66% of bird species are in decline), outside of outdoor cat heavy areas you seem to want to focus on.
Plastic straws didn't cause the climate change.