this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
338 points (88.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

39117 readers
1672 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] miked@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

People who have been in situations where having a gun would have made things better tend to not be around anymore to post about it.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some of us have been victims and may have a different opinion.

[–] teft@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also some of us have been to war or grew up in the deep woods where having a gun can save your life.

I guess technically that's being a victim too. Just that the perpetrator is more likely to be a bear than a person.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

In most cases just the noise from a gun will be enough but a rabid raccoon might need dispatched. Also, some of are too old,or fat, to run from an animal.

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep being 20 feet away from a bobcat will probably make you reassert things. Also having a handgun pointed at you as well. And hearing a ricochet of a bullet right in front of you.

I’m not saying a gun helps in all those situations but it definitely changes your available options.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bobcats are relatively ok, maybe you meant cougar (mountain lion) or wolverine? The latter is especially nasty

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 days ago

Been a while, coulda been a cougar just happy it announced its presence versus decided my neck looked tasty.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And some of you may be upvoting any plausible argument for gun ownership, even in the face of overwhelming objective evidence that it makes societies vastly unsafe.

Here's the thing about guns and victimhood, access to guns causes far more victims then access to guns prevents, and it always inherently will. In that environment, a predator intent on committing a crime will always have one, and a victim only ever might have one.

If you rely on mutually assured destruction arguments, then you have armed and killing each other over road rage because humans are dumb emotional children who think they're more mature then they are.

Thanks for your hypothetical but I’m speaking from first hand experience. When you have the same type of experience and aren’t just speaking off a statistics sheet you might change your tune. Most people do.

Personally I think we need massive gun control reform. But I don’t live in that world, or a world where that’s going to happen in my lifetime even. So I’ll continue to do what’s most practical for the reality I live in.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe so, but we live in a world where guns exist. Choosing to disarm oneself doesn't change that, and certain things can change the math.

There was a violent incident at a nearby house, and it took police 40 minutes to arrive because I live in the middle of nowhere, so right off the "call the police" option essentially doesn't exist for me. I also have no kids in the house. If children come over, the gun that isn't in the safe goes to the safe and the ammunition goes to the car. I am not suicidal. For me, gun ownership makes sense where it doesn't for others.

If I lived in a country where guns didn't outnumber people it may not make sense. Though with the current government I also wouldn't give mine up if they were outlawed.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Less guns there are in rotation and more screening there is when getting one effects straight how likely it is for the bad guy having a gun.

Nobody is suicidal until they are and nobody leaves the guns out for children until they do. Also guns at house escalate domestic violence cases.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So my personal solution is what? Can I un-invent firearms? Can I ensure not only that they're outlawed, but that hundreds of millions of them are magically rounded up? Should I trust US law enforcement to protect me and respect my rights?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe so, but we live in a world where guns exist.

No, you live in a country that chooses to manufacture guns in response to people buying them, and you choose to actively perpetuate that by going and spending money buying guns and gun infrastructure, directly funding gun companies / their lobbies, and then by going online to try and spread that justification so that you can feel slightly less guilty about choices you've made that you know are wrong.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

So we do in fact live in a world where guns exist.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Guns have caused a lot of harm. They seem evil until you need one. I was hiking solo in the wilderness once and was carrying one for wildlife and was attacked by a homeless guy. I shoved him away and pulled it out and he ran off.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I cant but wonder if bear spray would have had the same effect.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In my particular case nobody got hurt because he feared the gun, and I doubt a spray can would have had the same effect.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

that's a risk they're willing for you to take

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

A girl just got killed by a mountain lion on a hike not 2 miles from me. A gun could have prevented this. I do live in the mountains so like this may not be common