this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
581 points (88.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

39117 readers
1554 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remon@ani.social 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It could also be solved by everybody always putting the seat up ...

But it won't because everybody not agreeing on one course of action is the more fundamental problem.

You're basically just saying "This disagreement could be solved if everybody would agree".

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But seat (edit: I meant lid) down is more hygienic when you flush. It isv the morally situation superior position

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is it more hygienic? I can't imagine that extra brim holding off a lot of the shit particles launched into the room upon flushing.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It doesn’t make your bathroom shit free or something but it does do this 🤷‍♀️

Not sure if it’s better or worse in any meaningful way tho

Edit: I assume commenter meant the whole seat including the lid but that could be a miscommunication

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 9 points 1 week ago

I was too quick, missed mention of the lid, that makes more sense 😄

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I really doesn’t matter tho because poop particles are everywhere regardless of your toilet seat orientation.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While true, quantity of poop particles also matters.
Your body can fight off loads of bacteria. But once it gets to an infection point, it can't keep up and you become ill.

So yeh, poop is everywhere. As long as it's small amounts, it's fine.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The study where gustofwind got the illustration says it's around 10x reduction of deposited bacteria with the lid down.

https://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(23)00820-9/fulltext#tbl0010

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

10x reduction doesn’t even make sense. It’s not possible to reduce by more than 1x, as that would be 100% of the bacteria gone.

And your link doesn’t support what you said at all.

The floor and the walls of the restroom were contaminated after toilet flushing, but no significant differences were observed between the contamination occurring with lid position up or down. Wall contamination was minimal, regardless of lid position, and there was no significant difference in contamination level between the surfaces assessed, but data indicated that the trajectory of the aerosol plume contamination may have changed. Floor contamination was not found to be reduced consistently by toilet lid closure prior to flushing.

Am I misreading something?

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in their narrative, I'm talking about their numbers. They measured plaque formation - colonies - of bacteria from surface wipes around the toilet after flushing a contaminated toilet bowl. Depending on the location & lid state, they got, generally 10^3-10^6 plaques. 10^5 with the lid closed, 10^6 open, which is a 10x difference. There's no difference in the surfaces directly facing the bowl; hardly surprising that there's little contamination left by the time you get all the way to the walls - 1/r^2 effect. Look at the surface you sit on.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’m much more interested in the conclusions and the meaning of the numbers, for two big reasons:

  • It doesn’t matter much if the reduction is 90%, if the remaining 10% is still enough to be a problem. It sounds like a lot, but I have some doubts that it actually makes much difference.
  • I care a lot more about locations outside the toilet than the specific locations in and on the toilet. The toilet is assumed to be contaminated regardless, the question is whether or how much it is contaminating the rest of the room.
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

But how does it compare to what's already there? How does it affect the average toilet user's bacterial load, and how does that compare to an approximate threshold for infection?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

House dust is up to 50% human skin particles. You're breathing in all sorts of crap, and outside I'm sure there's loads more including animal crap.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s a lot easier to clean the walls than the ceiling

☝️🤓

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Clean both. Don’t clean both.

Still. The poop particles remain.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

But I don't lick the ceiling...

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah i get the picture but the real question is whether this whole topic is even worth discussing or whether the effect size is so small that it practically doesn't matter.

i mean, handbags and door knobs are some of the worst offenders to hygiene but you never see people getting all worked up about those topics, even though i suspect they're much more significant than whether the toilet lid is up or down. that's why i'm suspecting people are inflating a small issue into a big trouble here.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't give a flying f about the toilet seat (it's IMO a child level discussion, do what you like people), but I and my whole family do wash our hands when we come back from the outside. Always.

yeah i do that too.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does make a difference, it means measurably less poo bacteria on places like your tooth brush

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mythbusters tested this and found no appreciable difference.

If you want a sanitized toothbrush, you'll need to use one of those UV cases.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It keeps the fecal mist a little bit more contained.

[–] remon@ani.social -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but not really the point.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the user meant to say "lid down"

  • seat down: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing

  • seat up: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing

  • seat and lid down: slightly inconvenient for both parties (but if it's consistent then you can build muscle memory), and hygienic when flushing

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

You are correct, I did mean lid down too

[–] remon@ani.social -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My point is, the entire problem is agreeing to one option in the first place. Which option you pick is irrelevant.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well rather OP is pointing out that there is a third option that both parties nay consider to be a fair compromise, and thus be more likely to agree to.

[–] remon@ani.social -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter if there are 2 or 20 options.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

But one option is hygienic, the other two are convenience. Fuck convenience, put the lid down and wash your hands, it's for everyone's sake

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does if one of the options leads to a successful compromise. Based on the comments on this post, it seems that this solution has worked for a lot of households

[–] remon@ani.social -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, whatever ... not the point.

[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the idea of “fairness” comes in that everyone has to do something, regardless of whether you use the seat or not. If you don’t use the seat, then you put the lid and seat down (presumably in one go). If you do use the seat, you put the lid down. Either way, you have to lift something before you use the toilet.

Personally I think toilets should just have their lids closed when not in use, regardless.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Personally I think toilets should just have their lids closed when not in use, regardless.

I agree. But the sole reason is that I don't want my cat to drink out of it (and potentially fall in). I'm also an enjoyer of the sit-down-wee, so no arguing there, either.

There are still good reasons for having other opinions about it, for people in other circumstances. And that's exactly why this is just a disagreement that can't be solved all and for once.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

… if everybody would agree with me.