this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
41 points (81.5% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

2089 readers
28 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in unrelated arguments.

Brigading — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from voting, commenting or manipulating the post in any way, this includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be permanently banned.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason given is perfect! 😂

(For the record all I did was disagree with their bullshit. Meanwhile they were incredibly insulting and childish as fuck towards me)

I’ll add:

They’ll never understand that while most everyone outside of their echo chamber thinks their politics may be ignorant and entirely misguided, people don’t hate them for it. No, they are hated for their hypocrisy, their arrogance and their condescending narrative that while sharing the exact same sewage system- somehow their shit doesn’t stink.

They are every bit as bad as MAGA, and in some cases… so much worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You definitely broke rule 3.

What was the comment?

It seems to be in a thread about 'leftists' hating on Zohran Mamdani, one of the furthest left politicians in the USA.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What was the comment?

I have no idea, but the fact that OP hasn't posted the comment here is more than enough evidence, not to mention how they absolutely sound like the kind of unapologetic liberal who would say unapologetically liberal shit and get banned for it.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no idea, but the fact that OP hasn’t posted the comment here is more than enough evidence,

That's... extremely dubious, especially considering that deleted comments are deleted for the user, not just hidden from others.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still, they likely know the contents even if they can't repeat it verbatim. Either way I doubt the mods on c/leftymemes decided to single them out from all the people defending Mamdani in the comments.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still, they likely know the contents even if they can’t repeat it verbatim.

There are numerous comments in the thread by the user which were all deleted (as the mods likely used the 'delete all comments' option which results in the deleted comments not showing in the modlog). Which one should they be summarizing?

Either way I doubt the mods on c/leftymemes decided to single them out from all the people defending Mamdani in the comments.

... the mod active in that thread is an open apologist for Russian imperialism, and one of the other mods site-banned a user (me) for downvoting things I disagreed with from one of their pet posters.

What makes you think they're above petty or absurd bans?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which one should they be summarizing?

Whichever comment they think likely contributed to the ban? As it stands we're basically being asked to take their word that their ban is unjustified, and they absolutely sound like the kind of person who'd rightly get banned under rule 3. Yeah not exactly a case I'd argue in court, but in the absence of better evidence I'm far more inclined to believe the ban is justified than otherwise.

What makes you think they're above petty or absurd bans?

Maybe they're not, but if this was a petty or absurd ban I'd expect to see more petty or absurd bans in the same thread given the large number of pro-Mamdani comments.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Whichever comment they think likely contributed to the ban? As it stands we’re basically being asked to take their word that their ban is unjustified, and they absolutely sound like the kind of person who’d rightly get banned under rule 3.

By their account, they were banned for disagreeing with the core argument being made ("For the record all I did was disagree with their bullshit.")

Maybe they’re not, but if this was a petty or absurd ban I’d expect to see more petty or absurd bans in the same thread given the large number of pro-Mamdani comments.

The entire point of a petty ban is that someone is banned because they irritated the mod or one of the mod's pets, not for violating a consistently-applied rule. Sometimes it's by pushing back too hard against the mod, other times by hitting a soft spot or using an argument the mod doesn't like.

Considering the remaining pro-Mamdani comments are pretty 'gentle' in their defense of Mamdani, I would be unsurprised if the ban was legitimately petty.

For that matter, calling support of Mamdani 'liberalism' (which any disagreement with the meme would necessarily include) is... questionable.

And how predictable, my most dedicated stalker, Eugene V. Debs Ghost, came to see me.