this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
422 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

78029 readers
4264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly didn't know that. Could you point me to a source where I can read more about it?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 18 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93United_States_trade_war

2x Trump's tarriff on solar panels, 3+x on evs, +25% on aluminum, batteries, and more

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all the same. That started as targeted tariffs as punishment for accusations of unfair trade. Tariffs have been frequently used in the past and targeted tariffs can be an important tool for specific types of trade issues. It did escalate into a trade war which didn’t help anyone, but with one specific country.

That’s not at all the same as widespread tariffs, including starting trade wars against important allies and trade partners

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's the same bullshit justification Trump used. If the dems genuinely opposed with Trump's trade war, they would have undone all his tariffs.

[–] Luxyr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

There might be a valid argument somewhere in there that constantly changing the trade policy is worse than keeping a bad one in place? Not sure the trade-off there though. If you know you have a certain tariff in place long term, you can work around that and the tariff can actually do the things it is intended to do. If the tariff changes on a whim, you can't and the country just becomes a more risky proposition to do business with.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Thanks for sharing!