this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
893 points (96.1% liked)

People Twitter

9554 readers
378 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dude I loved the concept of Encyclopedia Brown but so many of the resolutions revolve around the most obscure of knowledge. Like yeah you get to figure out who don it but holy crap relying on knowing the exact dimensions of a US dollar bill to identify the coin collector as the culprit is quite a stretch for 8-12 year olds

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't knowing obscure knowledge the concept of Encyclopedia Brown?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I meant it's the whole you have to try to figure out who was lying before reading the last part. I'm realizing as I type this it could've entirely not been an intentional part of the reading experience of those books and just something my mom inserted when she was reading them to me

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a damned good mom. Kudos to her for working so hard.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

The problem with the encyclopedia brown crime-solving was that everything was predicated on being guilty until proven innocent. Almost every single one of his 'cases' was never really solved, the perp usually just confessed as soon as a single lie was 'proven.'