I love the Fediverse and Lemmy. But technically, it still lags behind the big platforms in some areas. And there are many things where I believe the Fediverse will eventually be significantly better than centralized platforms, but which are still underdeveloped. Unfortunately, I can't program myself, or at least not very well. So I'm wondering how I can best support development financially.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shitting on Rust while propping up Python, whose ecosystem receives every day more and more influx of Rust-based tools and libraries is... a weird choice.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is your choice: you could look at the set of features that PieFed has and how quickly they were developed, and you could compare that to the requests sent to Lemmy for features that have not and seem at this pace like they will never be done, and you may conclude whatever you like.

Maybe it's not the language, maybe the PieFed devs are just simply that good while the Lemmy ones are not, is that what you are implying?

Or maybe you don't know the feature comparison between those two software platforms - fwiw I included a link above.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm specifically complaining about you shitting on Rust. The other things you mention aren't germane to your language-specific attack.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

written in Python (which many developers are already familiar with, rather than the extremely niche Rust that even experienced C++ coders are loathe to have to learn)

There are pros and cons to every language. Is what I said inaccurate? "Many developers are already familiar with" Python, whereas many people are not wanting to learn Rust. I'm not saying it's not a good language (or that it won't be one when it gets finished), but from the standpoint of how many people are willing to join a project to write code for the Threadiverse, it does hold back feature development.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your assertion that "many people are loathe to learn Rust" (with the obvious implication that it's unworthy of attention) or that it is an "incomplete" or "extremely niche" language, are unsubstantiated and insulting assertions themselves.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said it was unworthy, just that for whatever reason, people are not doing it. And... it is incomplete? And perhaps "extremely" niche is the wrong phrase but definitely "common" is something that it is not.

Again, I have not asked you to take my word for it: compare the feature sets yourself to see the empircal evidence with your own eyes.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 23 hours ago

people are not doing it

Ah, yes of course. The community of Rust programmers is full of imaginary beings, holograms and simulations.

it is incomplete

Care to specify what is missing?