this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

Australia

4680 readers
139 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should charge rego by weight and volume. We should measure safety by damage inflicted, not damage deflected.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We already to. IMHO rego is weight based.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Rego is weight-based, but it's utterly fucked.

My 900kg hatchback costs $149 more to register than a ute up to 4500kg out in the country.

In the city, the rego difference is $1.10.

https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/registrations/fees-and-charges/vehicle-fees#registration-renewal-fees-for-light-motor-vehicles

What's worse, their FAQ says a lot of TAC claims for utes are paid by workcover, not the TAC. That's why it's cheaper.

...so people who purchase a roadblimp to use for school dropoffs are dodging the TAC charge, whilst being a much larger hazard than everyone else.

https://www.tac.vic.gov.au/about-the-tac/our-organisation/transport-accident-charge?drop=6

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I did not realize that rego is state specific. IMHO NSW has most sane method.
In NSW your hatchback will cost $270 and 3 tonne SUV $949. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/vehicle-registration/fees-concessions-and-forms/vehicle-registration-fees

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

As a Victorian I am loathe to say it, but this is definitely one thing you guys do a hell of a lot better than us.

Especially with the uptake in EVs, which while better for the environment long-term also pose a similar issue for pedestrians and cyclists, registration costs need to be reviewed and rethought from the ground up.

[–] Tau@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on the state. NSW for example is one that does vary depending on weight (based on weight ranges, not a full sliding scale) - there's a ~$180 difference between my sedan and van due to the van's higher tare weight placing it in the next category up. QLD on the other hand is one that doesn't - they charge based on the cylinder count instead.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is rego on a little i20 so damn expensive then

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)