this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
338 points (99.4% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1260 readers
722 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“There are a lot more people out here living in abject poverty than what people like to think or admit to. You voted for this—and now we’re paying the price.”

Employees learned of the cuts on Monday in a video message from Michael Adams, CEO of BlueOval SK.

Adams announced the transition would mean “the end of all BlueOval SK positions in Kentucky.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

That is like saying Toyota was going to screw itself over by releasing the Prius.

They are literally required to make the decision that most economically benefits the company

No, that not true. Many shareholders will push for that, but many companies i vest heavily into development that stifles short term profits for long term gain and running a company into the ground with poor decisions is not illegal in any way whatsoever.

How would the law even know what decisions are the most profitable anyway? That bit of misinformation needs to die.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously. Yes, the management of the company could be sued for intentionally tanking a company, but even that would need some egregious shit like emails saying "lol we're tanking the company on purpose" to get anywhere with it.

Long term profits, building brand awareness and goodwill are things companies can aim for instead of short term profits.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Remember that scene in the Dark Knight where the Joker holds a giant cash bonfire, burning all that mob cash? I'm pretty sure a CEO would have to do that before they could actually be sued by shareholders for not seeking maximum profit. There are just too many possible paths to profit otherwise, and they're allowed to focus on the long term rather than the short term.