this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
407 points (96.4% liked)

World News

51361 readers
2052 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.

On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.

As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I think anyone millennial or older can attest that access to porn has changed drastically in the past 2 decades. In the pre-youtube era video porn required physical media. Most teens were fapping to static images or soft core feature length films.

I do think getting access to the smorgasbord of pornography available these days at too young an age does short circuit the natural transition from boyish curiosity to healthy sexual interest.

Skipping over the phase where boobs is all it took and going straight to deepthroat anal gaping seems like a recipe for problems afaic. It's like having absinth for your first alcohol instead of a beer.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Bro, when I was like 9 my friend was like: "oh cool, the internet, go to shiteaters.com and I was like: that's a reasonable request, and it was exactly what you'd think it was.

I was using a 28k modem which was pretty good for the time.

Like. These days my ass.

Before all the tube sites there was limewire et al. And the tube sites are MUCH better in terms of the kind of content they freely offer, believe me.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

no, it doesn't.

the issue is economic insecurity, not watching porn.

also, just because stuff is available doesn't mean anyone/everyone is watching it. you make a boatload of poor and false assumptions.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 hours ago

This explains so much about you...