Technology

77795 readers

2241 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

546

No AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blog (www.waterfox.com)

submitted 2 days ago by brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

One could have sort of "permission rule" messages to be interpreted by clients to decide, during "replaying" a group with its messages, which action was valid and which wasn't, and what can this specific user do to the group at this specific moment.

clients could then be overwhelmed with mass invalid messages by bad actors

There could be different types of messages, perhaps with references to "interpreter" messages containing scripts.

I don't know how safe could that be, but deltachat does something like that

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 14 hours ago

clients could then be overwhelmed with mass invalid messages by bad actors

It could be a shared responsibility to filter these out, similarly to email spam.

Both by users and by relay\storage services.