this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
403 points (96.3% liked)

World News

51361 readers
2055 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.

On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.

As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Is porn really behind the misogyny? What about the tards in the so-called "manosphere" saying all sorts of crazy and immoral shit? Those have more reach than whatever extremely weird pornography is supposed to be at fault. Is this what not being able to say "this is objectively wrong/right" because of Western moral relativism leads to?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Western moral relativism

this is called post-structuralism btw, just so you can give a name to it

the idea that there is no (absolute) right or wrong, only subjective interpretations of the world

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 18 hours ago

Lots of things feed into it. The porn is just one of them.

This is part of a big effort to combat misogyny right now, which will be for naught when Reform rolls into power, declares it all "woke" and makes the problem 10 times worse.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 day ago (18 children)

It's in the article and it's very good. You should read it.

Preventing young men being harmed by “manosphere” influencers such as Andrew Tate.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] FarceOfWill 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thing is the specific guy we're all thinking of ran a porn company. One with little consent.

I do think porn is a symptom not a cause and targetting it wont actually help. Mistreatment of women wasnt exactly rare in say the 50s, even if it wasnt filmed for money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Well, you know all the humiliation porn, hardcore porn, rape porn and such?

That's not a very nice representation of sex that can be considered safe for anyone, especially young humans with a developing brain.

Can we say that is objectively wrong? Or are we all so addicted to porn that we get angry as soon as it comes up in such discussions?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (8 children)

"Young humans" sure. Not young humans, you absolutely do you.

There's a bit of an emerging trend in leftist European circles in particular that sees porn as inherently patriarchal and wrong and we're not ready for how much anti-porn is going to be the new terfism yet. This is going to suck a lot, and not in a good way.

in leftist European circles in particular that sees porn as inherently patriarchal and wrong and

i would just like to point out that not everybody sees it like that. i identify as leftist and don't see things that way, even though porn often is exploitative. but that has nothing to do with the porn itself, but with the economic coercion that is at play when the thing is created: for money. that's the problem, that it happens for money, and not voluntarily. and that's an economic problem, not one of porn itself.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a bit of an emerging trend in leftist European circles in particular that sees porn as inherently patriarchal

So long as women choose to do it to fulfill capitalist needs (which is to say, to avoid the implicit violence of homelessness and/or incarceration), rather than simply because they enjoy it, then it kind of is.

If not specifically patriarchal, then at least evil and exploitative in some capacity.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree with you, but if you're going to take that position you have to include work as a whole, not just sex work. There are differences, sure, but we're all selling our minds, bodies, and time just to stay alive.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Oh I absolutely do apply that position to all work. But I would do so with the caveat that if you have a career which helps people even despite the reality that you're being exploited while doing so - like taking care of kids or special needs people or the environment or something - then that might provide you with more happiness than purely selling access to your body.

That's not at all intended as a judgement of the mere fact, though. If you genuinely prefer sex work to the available alternatives to you, get that bag. Or maybe you even help people in your capacity as a sex worker, I don't know.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that’s porn
it’s not real life

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A simple web search will prove you wrong.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

… humiliation porn, hardcore porn, rape porn

the porn is porn
the real life incidents are real life

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And teaching young kids about the difference is important, because you are 100% right but kids don't realize unless taught.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm not talking about the tragic endings of the process, but about the process itself.

More violent porn being consumed leads to more demand of the same. It basically rewires your brain, like drugs. Look it up if you have any doubt.

Educating about porn should be mandatory like educating about drugs and all similarly harmful stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)