this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
734 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

13400 readers
1011 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Brave posting Ai content. Surprised you have more upvotes than downvotes with this crowd.

I’m happy to see things summarised by LLMs, so thanks for the details.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

summarized

Oh, then surely the Google AI can tell us exactly what it summarized so we can confirm accuracy, right?

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you’re not happy to see it then move along. Why you feel the need to comment on things you don’t like.

I’m happy to see so I’ll stay and engage.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just questioning the use of "summarizing" here.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ah by bad.

Is it wrong to use that word in the context I did?

Summarise: verb

give a brief statement of the main points of (something)

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure, that's why I was asking about the source of what it's allegedly summarizing.

That's a problem with Google AI, you can't be sure if it's pulling the data from somewhere or just making it up whole cloth

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ah i see. I guess I dont care (not in a negative way to you) for something like this where it means nothing to me if these figures are made up as I’ll never think of it again and it satiates the curiosity still.

I will say only really trust LLMs with my field of expertise as I can be confident I know when it’s talking shite.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Why don't you care about believing true things? You really don't care if the information being fed to you is true or not? Can you not understand that this is the exact mindset that has led us to the anti-intellectual hellhole we now reside in?

[–] DahGangalang 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm mostly cool with it because they disclosed it was AI up front. Its also a summarization (vs OC), so even if it isn't exactly correct it probably just mixed up a year/dollar value pairing at worst.

Must be the time of day, as I’ve disclosed before and been downvoted to oblivion. This place is exhausting at times.

To think I found people more cynical than me, now that’s impressive.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I did skim a bunch of articles first, all with the same info, but they were too long-winded or paywalled to link to. This summary seemed just right...

[–] DahGangalang 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yup, this (I feel) is one of the few areas where AI is valuable.

I've got a buddy who just got hired on at a large company as a software developer. Apparently their code base is so arcane and in such unusual frameworks that they recently fed all their documentation to an LLM and are using that to help onboard new employees (vs trying to have experts try to train up people personally).

While I think having a clean and clear codebase should have been their priority, patching it over with an AI teacher is far from the worst solution.