Risa: Your Home Away from Spacedock
Welcome to Risa
All the pleasure of shore leave, none of the holodeck glitches.
Rule 1 — Be Civil, Not Klingon
This is a vacation planet, not the neutral zone.
- No harassment, brigading, or trolling
- No bigotry
- Keep the banter playful, not hostile
Rule 2 — No Prohibited Cargo
Some things aren’t welcome aboard.
- No spam or scams
- No porn or sexually explicit content
- No illegal content
- NSFW memes must be properly tagged
Rule 3 — Keep It Trek
Posts should be Star Trek memes or Trek-adjacent humor.
- Crossovers are fine
- Low-effort “unrelated” memes may be spaced out the nearest airlock
Rule 4 — Gatekeeping Belongs in a Black Hole
You’re welcome to have your own opinions on what counts as “real” Star Trek but forcing your view on others or pretending it’s the only valid one? That’s not the Starfleet way.
Everyone’s Trek is valid, from TOS purists to Lower Decks shitposters, and you don't get to dictate what is real or not for everyone.
If you see a post that violates the rules, or that doesn't inspire Jamaharon, report it so the mods can handle it.
Otherwise grab a horga’hn, order a Risan Mai Tai, and enjoy your shore leave.
view the rest of the comments
The current military rooster under Pete Hegseth has changed radically in a matter of months. Most recently, SOUTHCOM Commander Admiral Alvin Holsey abruptly left his command over the attacks on Venezuelan fishing vessels.
Meanwhile, we gave four different CTOs the rank of Lt Colonel in July. All of them have been tightly allied with the Thiel/Musk wing of the Administration in their efforts to integrate the Pentagon with the Silicon Valley surveillance state.
Clearly, we are not above rapidly changing the military rooster to meet the immediate demands of the President.
These trends aren't new. Prior to the Clinton Admin, they were significantly worse, but they're still abysmal even after neoliberal reforms.
And when the function of the modern US military is to facilitate wealth transfer from occupied foreign nations to (overwhelmingly white) American shareholders and executives, you can't help notice a certain pattern in who they send.
Please, please can you directly acknowldge the problem in your original assertion that more of the current military staff in Africa should be black because they are black. This isn't about making all systems more fair. This is about whether or not it is appropriate to concentrate black personnel in Africa. I assert it is not appropriate, nor would it be appropriate to send other personnel into other theaters based on their racial geographic origin. That has huge "go back where you came from" energy.
That sending an all-white team of neck-snappers into an African nation to coordinate with white owned-foreign businesses in pursuit of resource extraction is normal and cool? And how dare anyone suggest otherwise?
What do you think the job of a high ranking military officer is, exactly?
You tell me. What is the job of a high ranking military officer?
Edit: I'm tired of this. You are way out of line, and you won't directly address your own statements without redirection. I'm out.
It's a shame, because they're a prolific poster whom I often agree with, but they also regularly have bad takes that are clearly outside their area of expertise, and invariably double down on them when challenged, or try to pivot to a slightly different point without ever acknowledging their errors. I can't respect people who never admit to being wrong.