this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
267 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

77795 readers
2281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Option two is not correct, option one is correct. This announcement is specifically for consumer gaming GPU's only, it does not affect institutional datacenter customers.

This is Nvidia saying "thanks small fry, you were useful, but we're leaving you behind now. Fight for the scraps." Complete cartel behavior.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AMD is a puppydog that follows Nvidia around on the open market with 10% or less market share. If Nvidia constricts supply and causes a massive price jump and shortages, AMD will just follow the pricing curve and we will still get no GPU's.

AMD is also 100% reliant on TSMC and VRAM suppliers, the same exact supply pressures causing Nvidia to turn off the consumer tap will come for AMD too.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this is about supply pressures, it's not Nvidia acting as a cartel, is it?

AMD has, as far as I understand, been outcompeting Nvidia on value for a good while. If this is Nvidia just being anti-consumer, I'd expect that to continue

AMD has, as far as I understand, been outcompeting Nvidia on value for a good while.

And yet their market share doesn't increase. Because Nvidia holds a stranglehold on both the software (CUDA, RTX support, frame gen, etc) AND sheer brand recognition- gamers always complain about Nvidia and want better AMD cards, but continue to line up in droves to buy Nvidia cards no matter what.

Nvidia knows they can do whatever the fuck they want right now.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When their only competition just hiked prices, why would they keep theirs low? That's free money.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll still undercut, just as they are doing.

I just don't think moaning about the companies makes any sense. If you imagine the most utopian scenario you think of, with communal ownership of all production, how do you think the commune is going to allocate GPUs? It's going to stick a load in hyped AI products and gamers will be last in line, just like now.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Sure, but AMD never undercuts enough for it to matter. They're always behind on features, brand recognition, software and say... eh $50 off.

The last time AMD actually undercut and sold well was the RX480 and that was a long time ago. AMD has just settled for 10% and is not willing to fight for more, and with enterprise being the big market now it's definitely not going to change.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll have to come crawling back when the business customers stop buying. AI winter is coming.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

That's still of no concern. If it all collapses and they need to start selling to consumers again, gamers will be desperate for the upgrade and pay top dollar. Screwing us over is a win-win for them.