this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
669 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36103 readers
3088 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Imagine having 79 unpaid users for every subscriber. Most companies would die from embarrassment.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft don't exist.

Let's say it together, kids: "If the service is free, then you're the....?"

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

penis? No wait, that doesn't sound right...

[–] REDACTED 9 points 2 days ago

The companies are stroking it to get the valuable juice out, and then steal your orgasm too. All you're left with drinking more water to sustain that.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The paid subscribers subsidize the unpaid ones. Sam Altman is a staunch socialist. Trump too, that communist-loving Mamdani fan. /s

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The paid subscribers subsidize the unpaid ones.

Even for paying customers, inference alone costs OpenAI several times more than revenue.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, having ~1.3% of paying users is fine considering they are using all the other users as free learning material for their models.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's really not, since all their models cost progressively more to run, and don't bring in any more money.

Remember, all those paying subscribers COST them money every month.

Which is really pathetic since we are paying their utility bills.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What's a normal amount? What proportion of people with Dropbox or Google Docs or Hotmail are paying customers?

Having a little over 1% doesn't seem that bad, I am faar more surprised that over 1% of users pay for ChatGPT (if your numbers are accurate).

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What proportion of people with Dropbox or Google Docs or Hotmail are paying customers?

Dropbox is nice enough to list it.

They have 700m users, and 18m of them pay for the service, so about double of OpenAI. Completely unlike OpenAI, however, they make quite a bit of profit, having a revenue of 2.55b and 1.63b in operating costs. OpenAI subscribers can't even cover their own cost of inference.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the numbers, you were saying the subscriber percentage was embarrassing so I was curious about that rather than their fairly infamous losses.

You've said OpenAI have about half the subscriber percentage of Dropbox, but if Dropbox is that profitable then that seems like they are doing particularly well and perhaps that subscriber percent is above average?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Peope don't usually compare OpenAI with Dropbox, but Dropbox isn't particularly great with the free-to-paid converion rating. 2.6% is pretty bad, but they STILL manage to make money because what they do is pretty cheap on a per-user basis. They just host data, and most of that data isn't really used much. Also, I don't know if Dropbox is "that" profitable. All I could find is that their revenue exceeds their operating costs, but I don't know if that covers R&D or marketing, which they probably spend a LOT of money on.

Comparisons with YouTube and Spotify get thrown around a lot more, which convert around 5% and a whoppingly insane 36%, compared to OpenAI's measly 1%. And both YouTube and Spotify actually make a LOT of money on their "free" users, via ads. OpenAI has no monetisation beyond subscribers, and they're very bad at getting people to pay for their stuff.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah that's a fair point. I don't think Dropbox does ads but the others I mentioned and the ones you mentioned all show/play ads for the free tier.

I guess OpenAI will be pretty keen to get ads into their free tier too, once they run out of investors' money.

[–] aski3252@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

however, they make quite a bit of profit

Pretty sure they didn't for a while. It's the same approach as always. Operate at a loss, gain (nonpaying) users, maybe sell or use their data and slowly turn up whatever you are doing to make money (ads, fee).

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure, it took dropbox 9 years, Amazon took 7.

OpenAI just turned 10, with profit nowhere in sight, and a path to profitability completely invisible.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is called moving the goal post

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

What is? Pointing out that dropbox has a conversion more than twice as high as OpenAI?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

And the subscribers are underpaying by such a huge amount that they're losing even more money from them than they are from the unpaid users.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’d rather not imagine being Spotify. Feels gross.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Spotify has 280m paid users, out of 780m monthly users. Roughly 26 times better conversion than OpenAI

https://investors.spotify.com/financials/default.aspx#quarterly-results

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

TIL. Holy shit, that’s wild.