this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
1482 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

9892 readers
2263 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 37 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe, WhY bOtHeR vOTiNg

Then chalk this item up with the million-and-one things that are completely ignored by the ~~spiritually purified~~ lazy mediocre idiots who passively let all this happen, this death by a million-and-one cuts, since Reagan.

But boy oh boy by golly, they sure do feel they are doing their part by chuckling at political zingers online, after the damage is done, because they let the mouth-breathers through the front door and gave them the goddamned keys to the house and car in the first place.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 9 hours ago

Blaming voters for how they vote is like blaming the weather when the forecaster got it wrong. We handed Harris an unprecedented amount of money and attention but her team made the wrong predictions on what would get people to vote. We can continue to blame misinformed voters and keep losing or we can learn a different lesson.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 11 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Keep pretending that the Democrats lost the election because of a conspiracy of online users further to the left of you, and not because they ran a botched campaign with an unelectable candidate.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

An "unelectable candidate" is not an obstacle. I mean, look at what the GOP ran...!

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump won the maximum number of elections winnable in the USA, what makes him unelectable?

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Have you actually had your eyes open for the last 10 years?

FFS a convicted rapist and 32 time fraudster, probable pedophile, who's using the office of POTUS to enrich himself and his awful family? A man whose negligence and mismanagement in his first term lost over a million extra lives to Covid. A man who betrayed all undercover CIA assets to Russia. A man who betrayed long time allies, the Kurds, to a genocide by Turkey. Who betrayed all the Afghans who helped America, to the Taliban. A man who is bombing small boats in the Caribbean, and double tapping any survivors. A man who is selling out Ukraine to please his owner, Putin, and of course for his own personal profit, and who has already done the same to the Palestinians.... A man who is disappearing American citizens, and other LEGAL visitors off the streets, to third world prisons.... Even though he "won" ( and I believe Elmo committed some fraud to help him win a second term...), by every metric and standard that exists outside of tRump America, the man is unelectable. I don't even think he's human, tbh...he's some sort of lizard creature with no normal human qualities. The fact that you even ask such a question tells me all I need to know about YOU, magat !

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 1 points 8 hours ago

You can make the list as big as you want. Trump is a pedophile and a fascist, and I'm a European communist who hates his fucking guts. But the measure of electability is NOT being a good, moral person, it's winning elections. I also hate Obama for his warcrimes, but he was electable as fuck.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I would love to know why Biden was electable but Harris was not.

Care to explain?

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I can only speak from my experience, but my mom voted Trump, Biden, Trump.

She voted for first Trump because her church told her you can't vote for Clinton because she's not a Christian, and she's always been apprehensive of Women in leadership.

She voted Biden because Trump's actions clearly showed he wasn't Christian.

She would have voted for Biden again. She struggled whether Trump or Harris were lesser evil. Too many Harris ads taking about reproductive rights she just couldn't force herself to vote Harris.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Your mom sounds like a weak person, unable to think for herself, and who betrayed her own gender. Honestly, I'd be too embarrassed to comment on her, if she was my mom.......

[–] edahs@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure with furrowed brow they would respond in a caveman like tone "Biden man, Harris girl. Girl bad, man goooood."

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 13 hours ago

the last three presidential elections seem to form a strong message: america is a nation of misogyny. hillary? unelectable. joe? record turnout. kamala? unelectable. their politics? nearly identical.

obviously there's more factors. personally i voted for Elizabeth Warren in 2020 and thought joe biden was the very worst candidate in the 2020 primaries. but the thing to understand about republican voters is that their engagement is that of a sports team (and there are democratic sports team voters). they will show up everytime to vote for their guy even if they hate him. the democrats have to counter this as an entire coalition. the candidates need to inspire turnout, and the voters have to turnout, otherwise the ratchet effect will continue forever

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, now quantify how many terminally online young leftists who didn't vote dem there are in the USA

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the republican candidate in 2016, 2020, and 2024 got the same number of votes just about every single time. the democrat candidate received nearly equal votes in 2016 and 2024. people were willing to turnout in mass numbers in 2020 to keep trump out of office in 2020 but not in 2024.

while i agree Kamala Harris could have gotten more votes shifting left, i also can't help but be frustrated about those ~10 million voters who were willing to vote for Joe Biden in 2020 but not Kamala Harris in 2024. what most leftist groups were advocating for was to vote for Harris and then commit the energy we were going to have to commit organizing to protest Trump protesting Kamala.

the thing is we saw big protests during the 46th presidency. the motivation was there. but now it's harder to coagulate and maintain those movements with ICE and Homeland security going full gestapo as opposed to before when they were 80% gestapo.

the big thing though is we're here now. i'd rather not relitigate the past, just maintain a critical analysis of it so future generations don't repeat it. what's more important is making sure there's a world for future generations to inherit.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Biden campaigned. Harris did, what, one longform interview? She really thought that was all she needed to sail away with the thing. The arrogance.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago

if you think that's all she did you weren't paying attention. not that there's anything wrong with that given your .uk home server, but this is a gross oversimplification that ignores both how much campaigning she did, and how much the specifics of her campaign eroded the positive momentum she had when biden dropped out

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago

I desperately wanted Kamala to win but goddammit I agree with you.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

unelectable candidate.

It's a FPTP system. She literally just had to be not worse than Trump. She was fine.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

FPTP: obvious on the internet, unknowable to candidates

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago

Wow the Harris campaign strategist has entered the chat.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

trump's base was excited. hers was alienated.

centrists think that that "marginally better than trump. sometimes. if we have to." is sufficient to win. It's not.

Fix your shit and you'll win.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

If she was fine, why did she lose the elections TO TRUMP

[–] Longylonglong@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen the first row of inaguration?

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -2 points 16 hours ago

Was it full of terminally online lefties?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Because she was only fine, and humans are illogical idiots who need to be externally motivated to act in their own self interest.

I know I sound jaded, but it's beyond stupid that he won. A vote for a literal corpse would've made more logical sense for anyone who isn't far right wing. But fuck critical thinking, I guess.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How the FUCK was Harris an "unelectable candidate"?

Keep pretending that your "both sides" bullshit was 1.) limited to the internet and 2.) didn't have a massive impact on lowering voter participation.

You're STILL FUCKING DOING IT, DUMBASS. You are saying, right here and now, that Harris was worse than Trump. HOW? For ONCE, fucking explain yourself.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 6 points 11 hours ago

How the FUCK was Harris an "unelectable candidate"?

She lost the election, have you heard of that?

You are saying, right here and now, that Harris was worse than Trump

No, I'm saying she was less electable. She decided to run a campaign of satisfying her Zionist overlords instead of gaining popular vote, she got the results she wanted. The Democrats would rather lose the elections than present an antizionist candidate

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe, WhY bOtHeR vOTiNg

Seriously, the fake "progressives" who refused to vote are the most detestable group in this mess. At least Trump supporters are brainwashed idiots. Fake "progressives" knew better and STILL helped Trump come back to power.