this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
188 points (97.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12958 readers
488 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

FYI I didn't get a Lemmy notification to your reply. This is really annoing, and its just about pushing me to try Piefed...

But yeah, I buy this. But problems:

  • It costs Valve a lot more money.

  • It requires more employees, or at least contractors/grants.

  • It requires finding expertise/passion in niches, and categorizing a whole lot of games.

And that’s what I think is needed. If Steam wants to be the Google of gaming that’s fine… as long as someone else is competing with a different approach to split the difference. Just Steam’s approach by itself would be bad, I think.

  • The gaming community have seemingly decided they like a Valve monopoly, which is quite unfortunate.

Given Valve's sort of libertarian/hands off ethos, I don't think they're going to take the "1st pary editorial team" approach. Heck, they seem to be aware of the issue, hence the Steam Curators program, but its not the same as bankrolling an editorial team that does it for a living.