this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
1685 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

9898 readers
2377 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"doesn't put a ceiling on wealth"

eeeeehh. maybe we fucking should?

increased privatisation is happening all over the Nordics. I don't know how much in Norway compared to here in Finland, but being in my fourth decade I can definitely see it happening and intensely. I can't get a fucking public dentist anymore. Hell, children aren't given free dental care anymore.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If no one were living in poverty I would be more accepting of the ultra-rich's existence.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Except that that's hard to happen.
The very existence of an ultra-rich means that there was someone who managed to get extraordinarily high amounts of extra value from someone as compared to what they paid that 'one' for it and then did it over and over again, essentially leeching value out of the system, making it a -ive sum game for anyone inside it.
So when you take more than you give, you end up breaking the original meaning of money (that was "proof of work/goodwill") and when you do that enough, the worth of work gets warped and those who do similar work, end up indirectly losing more than what they give.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The whole point is that the floor is the important thing. In Scandinavian countries, they have a fairly firm upper bound. But they don't suffer when people above that upper bound flee to avoid taxes

The critical part is the lower bound

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In Scandinavian countries, they have

Sounds like you don't actually live here.

We don't have a "firm boundary" on people being rich. We just don't have multi-billionaires. Or if we do, they're the silent type, not the Musk/Bezos type. And even those are pretty different.

But like, how many multi-billionaires do you know from like Minnesota, ​Louisiana, ​Oregon & ​Oklahoma?

The progressive taxation we have is for income, not capital gains. So essentially you can never get rich by working, but if you're just profiting from having a lot of capital (renting properties etc, even airbnb, and tons of other ways for rich people to shift their income from "labour income" to capital gains), then you have a flat 30% tax rate. And if you're actually a billionaire, you'd just shift it all to a tax haven to avoid even the 30%.

Sure, yeah, I agree there's a certain type of bottom — insofar that we don't allow people to die to starvation or the elements — but that's a fucking low bar, don't you think?

I bet you're one of those people who actually believe Finland is the happiest country in the world. (It's like North Koreans talking about freedom lol.)

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (45 children)

Jesus Christ, you have no idea...

Our ultra-wealthy pay literally nothing in taxes. They take out loans against their holdings, and when they do sell they use losses on paper to offset their gains, so they get away with paying nothing

And most of ours fly under the radar too. There's around 300 resorts and compounds worldwide where the billionaires live their social lives away from cameras, not counting their more personal compounds

We do let people die of starvation and to the elements. In fact, we regularly have fights over if poor children deserve to be fed, and the results recently have been "no"

Lately, we've been criminalizing homelessness to put a capstone on decades of regularly tearing down whatever shelter they manage to cobble together.

Hell, a church got sued for letting homeless people shelter during a cold snap. People get arrested and charged for feeding the homeless in some places

And don't get me started on medical care... It's literally worse than you could imagine. You wouldn't believe me even if I sugar coated it

I'm sure your life isn't perfect, but have no idea how bad it's gotten over here. I'd kill for a system as imperfect as the one you take for granted

You probably think I'm exaggerating about all this, but I'm really not. Luckily the administration is incompetent, because otherwise we'd be neck deep in a genocide right now. Instead, both of our political parties have settled on mass death, just so long as it's indirect

load more comments (45 replies)