this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
798 points (91.6% liked)
Comic Strips
20620 readers
3132 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Still nothing but your word that she's "manipulating" anyone or anything.
And, breaking news, everyone uses that sub for advertising. Do you also get this self-righteous when creators link their patreon or other socials? How exactly is OF different?
I looked it up. I can't find anything except people furiously agreeing in some hate-filled reddit ouroborus without a beginning. Can you link to something substantial, that isn't reddit comments or videos about reddit comments?
From what I've seen, she posts crowd-pleasing media, seems to like online attention, has been cool with people reworking her comics, lost her shit for a week or so at one point, and has an onlyfans.
How do you know she has bots?
Who would be talking about this except redditors? Your request makes no sense.
Does that mean the only proof of the bots and unfair moderation is people saying stuff? No screenshots of messages from the chick asking mods to take down mean comments, or IP addresses for different accounts boosting her posts?
We get it, you think she’s hot.
I haven't seen her. You got that onlyfans link?
"Laser focus", lol. You tried to justify the OF accusation and I explained why that's bs.
As for the "whole thing", your word doesn't prove anything and your outright refusal to provide even an ounce of evidence for your deluge of accusations suggests I'm not the one acting in bad faith here.
You don't have to be a full blown redditor, just not be blind. Most of these accusations are easy to verify just by looking at her posts.
She regularly make self pity posts because "people are mean" (aka they don't lick her boots), where she explicitly advertised her only fan. Last such post had 17k karma within 2 hours. Seems fishy no ?
She even boasted about gaining lots of follower after making rage bait and having her OF boosted by the engagement.
Comics moderators are known to be simp, and will remove any criticism of her comics, valid or not.
Investigate it yourself and you'll see what's going on. Instead you scream because we didn't provide a ready to eat summary of what's going on...
If you're going the misogyny call-out route again, just know I held the exact same view of the blind guy that draws his wife nude. Same energy and they both defend each others because they have the exact same tactic to sell porn to teenagers on Reddit.
Can we please not parrot alt-right dogwhistles here?
Do you have any counter argument? Or do you prefer name calling without substantiation?
This has nothing to do with the alt right or dog whistle..
"Simp" is a misogynistic alt-right dogwhistle. That's enough of an argument to completely disregard your point.
Lol. Since when? Do Americans like inventing new meaning to words when it suits them?
Is it a dog whistle to say that half of reddit simps for Gabe Newell ?
Edit: it's also such a cop out to disregard the whole arguments for a semantic disagreement. You don't have anything real so you just attack the form.