this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
644 points (97.6% liked)
Comic Strips
20568 readers
2028 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Entertain me your definition on how a billionaire relatively humbles themselves “down to Earth.”
What kind of garbage definition is that lmao. Not your fault I know you didn't write the fucking dictionary but what the hell. Here is one that doesn't use its own fucking root to define itself.
If you click into it and read right through, you may find it a more sensible and robust definition than the cambridge one with all its "gooder" and "badder". ;)
Neither are great though.
Definition 2 is the closest to the way that relatively is used in most speech and it still uses "relation" in its definition. I don't love the Cambridge one but it is better than the MW one.
… So, what are you trying to compare here?
I am aware you're not
palordrolap@fedia.ioOh shit you weren't just being an asshole throwing out definitions to prove a point, my bad for assuming the worst.
He [Gabe] is relatively [in comparison to other billionaires] down to earth.
Its not a high bar but he does pass it especially if you're only comparing to the more well known billionaires.
Some people can and have interpreted me calling their source bad a personal call out. I've done that before, honestly it's not a great thing to do but emotions exist.
I am an anarchist, for goodness gracious. I initialize all my conversations in neutrality until proven otherwise.
When I am in this community, I comprehend folks come here jovially, with the intent to entertain.
Yeah HOW? He is a scumbag authoritarian. He sents talent to deathcamps. He drowns people in the Pacific. HOW does that compare to other “down to Earth” bourgeois oppressors?