this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
547 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

77631 readers
1584 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is correct. However, many websites/newspapers/magazines/etc. love to get more clicks with sensational headlines that are technically true, but can be easily interpreted as something much more sinister/exciting. This headline is a great example of it. While you interpreted it correctly, or claim to at least, there will be many people that initially interpret it the second way you described. Me among them, admittedly. And the people deciding on the headlines are very much aware of that. Therefore, the headline can absolutely be deemed misleading, for while it is absolutely a correct statement, there are less ambiguous ways to phrase it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

can be easily interpreted as something...

This is pretty much the art of sensational journalism, popular song lyric writing and every other "writing for the masses" job out there.

Factual / accurate journalism? More noble, but less compensated.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is a terrible headline. It can be debated whether it's intentionally misleading, but if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago

if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful.

Awfully well compensated in terms of advertising views as compared with "good" writing.

Capitalism in the "free content market" at work.