this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
1090 points (99.6% liked)

memes

18432 readers
2450 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No it'll cost you, it comes out of your after tax wage. But it's an investment into you and your colleagues futures for better wages, stronger protections and benefits.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In my country you can get union dues back as a tax deduction.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean, "get them back"? Do you mean, "pay less tax by listing them as an expense"? Because you still have to pay for them, just not as much.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes you pay less tax up to a yearly cap. The yearly cap for 2025 and 2026 is 1100 dollars. So if I was in the Union listed in the image here and had to pay 700 dollars then I would list it on my tax form and pay 700 dollars less on my taxes that year.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I think it's word choice that caused confusion here. In the US at least, "deduction" means you don't have to pay taxes on it, not that you get back the full amount that you paid. What you're talking about would be called a tax credit.

[–] xartle@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

I didn't know that. That feels like something this administration will cancel on a random Thursday...

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

what is this utopia?

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The protections are key here. I'd take a slightly lower wage for a healthy work environment any day, and I know that most people agree.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also if the company refuses and hires scabs you can always put the money towards hiring union enforcers. Mind you we aren't quite there again but I don't we're too far off either, showing up to a scabs home at 2AM to have a nice talk or ambushing the boss on his way home. The glory days may be long gone but I hope to see new glory forged.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago

What really works is when unions start being powerful enough to dictate governmental policy. That's when things really improve. Of course the millionaires and billionaires will complain about interference, because it's only good when they do it.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

It comes out of their pocket because unions tend to negotiate for better pay