this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
88 points (90.7% liked)
movies
2277 readers
262 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At first I was thinking, you know what...it's a shame it was a flop, because at least it was a filmmaker trying something original that wasn't just a sequel/superhero/crap action franchise movie that we've seen ad nauseaum.
But then I thought...no...that's too easy. While that is true, it let's Coppola off the hook far too easy than he deserves.
A better phrase would be, "It's a shame that the movie turned out to be hot garbage", because that is ultimately what made it flop, and we're doomed to have even fewer investors interested in original content as a result.
The investors wouldn’t touch that film anyway. That’s why he paid for it himself.