this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
962 points (98.3% liked)

Witchy Memes

6018 readers
211 users here now

Be cool to each other. We'll welcome most occult themes, it's okay if you stray from witchcraft a bit.

No advertising. No trolling. No hate. Violaters will be removed unceremoniously.

We love art credits when possible.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Even into adulthood, they love bullshit like horoscopes and blood types (the latter more prominent in Japan).

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] BunScientist@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

not the part where they define your personality and compatibility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_personality_theory

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obviously. But in Japan, people think certain blood types have specific personality traits and it gets really annoying when people believe it as if it were solid science.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Whoa, what?

...nope. Considered hormonal influence on blood cells for a moment but unlikely and even then not over statistic noise.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's apparently because we have a pretty even split between A, B, AB, and I types unlike many other countries where the population tends to lean heavily on one type, which makes it easier to categorize people and traits.

Tbh, this "reason" is something I saw ages ago on TV, so I'm not even sure if it's true. Please take it with a gigantic grain of salt!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Some isolated island effect?

[–] princesspurple@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just let people enjoy things, jeez

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I didn't say they couldn't. It's just bullshit.

[–] princesspurple@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s such a Capricorn thing to say

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Um, I don't believe in astrology; I'm a Sagittarius.

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So strange how people will throw snark at others for enjoying harmless fun.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Harmless fun until they talk shit about one of their friends' boyfriend because his sign doesn't match and they think he'll cheat on her... To fish one example out of the sea...

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

That goes deeper than simple horoscopes. If it wasn't horoscopes, it'd be religion. If not religion, race. If not race, diet. If not diet, hobbies. It's like talking shit about someone because they don't use your favorite distro. Is Linux the problem? Or is it someone's capacity to pass condescending judgements over silly things? Some people are insufferable. That's a people issue.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Back in our early 20s, my friend decided not to date a guy because of his horoscope and some tarot readings she got. You could throw away the love of your life that way.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This kind of thinking is silly. First, that’s her problem. Second, whoa, jeez, are the stakes really that high? “I’d be married happily ever after if only she hadn’t gotten those darn tarot cards read.” Move on, meet someone else.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your comment makes zero sense. I never said it was my problem and the stakes are the same any time you have a potential relationship. You inferred quite a bit of nonsense into my comment and that’s all on you.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What were you trying to say with your comment?

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m saying that your favorite song was written but you’d never know (NUFAN). My friend threw away a potentially great relationship for no reason. It could have been great or it could have been terrible. The point is not to use irrational criteria whenever possible.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok man, I’m sorry for your friend’s possibly great possibly terrible relationship she didn’t have in her early 20s because of horoscopes.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, see, again, your snark makes no sense. You’re saying this like I’m angry and bitter or something. It’s just a thing I mentioned in passing. No idea why you struggle with this kind of thing so much.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You’re inferring that i think you’re angry and bitter. None of that is in what I wrote.

“Makes zero sense.” “All on you.” “No idea why you struggle with this.” That’s a lot of projection, accusation, and defensiveness for something you’re just mentioning in passing.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao ok sure. You make right wingers sound coherent.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok so you are angry and bitter, thanks for clearing that part up

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From the point of view of the dumbest human being on earth, absolutely!

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The deep irony here. The user arguing against “irrational” filtering is filtering irrationally in real time, in the same conversation they’re making the argument. Phenomenal work.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don’t understand what words mean, absolutely! I even went back to see what I originally wrote and your responses are even more ridiculous than I initially judged you for. I hope that maybe someday you will learn to be a decent person.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are functionally illiterate.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get well, man. This isn't healthy behavior. This is you in the past 24 hours:

  • 2x "functionally illiterate"
  • 3x "right wing level intellect"
  • 2x "dumbest human being on earth"
  • 2x "You make right wingers sound coherent"
  • "deserves to be in prison for stupidity"
  • "deserves to be tortured and publicly executed"
  • "worthless sack of dogshit"
  • "baby brained dumbfucks"
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tbf aren't they used a lot for taking money from vulnerable people or just overall spread gossip about those you dislike?

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Believing stupid shit like astrology actually affects our personalities and actions is not harmless at all.

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

You'd be surprised which things affect our personalities and actions. I'd bet my left hat that you have some silly influences over you that you think are mundane and normal. And I bet those things make you more fun to be around too. Or less fun, depending on your company.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The majority of it is indeed harmless fun, but I personally know someone who believes they don't mesh well with specific signs. So much so that once they learn someone has that sign their opinion sours.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like their problem

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it is a problem with their magical thinking surrounding superstitious, preconceived notions about others. Just like how phrenology is not only bunk, but actively harmful in stereotyping people, inaccurately, for things they cannot control, zodiacal discrimination is similarly potentially harmful bunk.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Phrenology was used for scientific racism. “Zodiacal discrimination” is used to … not go on dates with people? Be a drag in social circles? What if someone doesn’t like my socks and refuses to date me? Is this potentially harmful bunk? What about haircuts?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Given how many idiots there are who make hiring decisions? Yeah, I'll bet that it has harmed a not insignificant number of people. As long as people have noted the movements of the heavens, people have made life and death decisions on the perceived significance of the positions of the stars, sun and moon. Bunk is bunk, and all it takes is one incredibly stupid demagogue to believe a horoscope for the world to change in a horrible way. If there is no other lesson of the last 10 years in american politics, then at least this: never underestimate either the depths of stupidity to which a human can descend, and never underestimate the damage that the truly stupid can cause.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok so we went from phrenology to … checks fucking notes … hiring managers using astrology to not hire someone and therefore causing significant social damage. So now this is about intelligence? Only “stupid” people believe in astrology? “Smart” people don’t cause damage? Or are you conflating intelligence with ethics?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What I am "conflating" is the stupidity of a moron with the tendency to make patently stupid decisions based solely on what an oracle tells you. Anyone can do it, but boy, it sure is more damaging when it's the leader of a country with nukes reading "outlook not so good, beware of the color red, look to the east". So yeah, I'm much more terrified of a stupid person with power and a fucking horoscope than I am of a smart person with a trolley problem in front of them. At least one of them is going to use a heuristic more complex than "this thing I read sometimes tells me today's a bad day, better blow up the world".

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok so now it’s no longer hiring managers, but a president with nukes. I’m losing track of what you’re trying to say. This stemmed from a comment about someone in a social circle using horoscopes and becoming a drag on the group.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Here, full circle, special for you, all subtext removed. To whit:

Having a subculture of stereotypes, vague prophecies, and self-proclaimed oracles is bad. The degrees of bad vary, but such a subculture is net negative at all levels. This is not a "bad apples" deal, as your original comment implied. It is a systemic problem, and using meaningless bullshit to stereotype people makes you a worse person, at any level.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just for me? Aw, thanks.

Look man, your argument keeps moving. Phrenology and “zodiacal discrimination” to hiring managers to president with nukes (wtf lmao — how is this still “zodiacal discrimination”?). Each time I question one of them, you escalate to higher stakes instead of defending the claim you made. Now you frame it as “here, let me remove the subtext for you.” You never presented a cohesive argument. Don’t frame it as me having missed something — you never presented it.