this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
206 points (99.0% liked)

Opensource

5542 readers
12 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Why even bother with HDMI??

ooh I love to pay royalties to and get permission to use the technology and the trademark. /s

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 46 points 2 months ago

Because love it or hate it, HDMI is the main interface that the vast majority of TVs use.

[–] jonne 30 points 2 months ago

For this specific device you want to be able to hook it up to a TV, and unfortunately TVs tend to come with HDMI, not the superior displayport.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Find me a TV that's both designed for gaming and has a DisplayPort. Hell, find me any consumer TV with the port. Remember that the Steam Machine is intended for the living room big screen, not a 27" gaming monitor.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Um, I said TV, and all three of these are monitors. Niche monitors at that too, none of them are even in stock.

Furthermore, how many console gamers do you know who have a 55" Alienware monitor in their living room? I did say consumer TV as well, ya know.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room...

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Look: It doesn't matter what you think is and isn't a TV, the fact of the matter is that the target market doesn't have one of these and doesn't care. They've got their $300 65" Hisense from Walmart, and guess what? Those TVs don't have DisplayPort. That's the point.

Now please stop being a pedantic jerk just for the sake of a it and go away.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Aren't you literally being pedantic on the definition? They're both displays in the 55 inch range that can display media and are made for consumers.

You're the one who keeps moving the goalposts.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK

There's always this option, could even include something like it in the box.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

That probably won't work. It will get basic video and maybe audio through, but not features like VRR, which is why you'd care about HDMI 2.1 support at all

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It will be replaced by GDMI which the Chinese invented in the future anyway.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did they also invent time travel?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They will invented it

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

That's coming in V2