this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
150 points (99.3% liked)

Economy

1992 readers
3 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal agency will skip the postponed October report on the Producer Price Index and instead roll those figures into November's report, which will be published Jan. 14, reported the Wall Street Journal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean inflation itself as a formula has been constantly tinkered with to make it look nicer, excluding extreme changes (unless they beneficially contribute to under-representing the actual inflation).

For example, inflation was supposed to be on average 4-5% YoY for the past ~5 years here in the UK, yet somehow everything that matters - food, bills, rent, etc. - went up by 50-70% if not more in that period.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean 5% inflation is a pretty high rate. At 5% YoY you'd have prices up ~30% in 5 years.

If that rate is uneven (lower/higher across different segments of the purchasing basket) you could get towards 50% inflation in some areas.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I said average - and that average was offset by the fact that during COVID (which does fall into the "past 5 years" period), inflation was pretty high "on paper" at 12% (at the time it felt much closer to 30-40%).

Recent years had "okay" inflation of 2-4%.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, I understand. I was just pointing out that compounding interest (even just on a yearly basis) adds up quick.