Not in modern day. Modern language, cutting out the nation part, which IMO is good, uses 'utopian'. There may be an archaic use I'm not familiar with, or you're referring to an ancient movement that died out, no longer exists, would be pointless anachronistic and racist to revive in a modern context.

baby thrown out with bathwater

States can get fucked and there are no walled gardens. Not for long anyway.

Zionism means shooting children in the genitals and raping people to death with dogs. Zionism means poisoning wells and mass starvations and double tap bombings of journalists all for land you don't even have any way to use yourself.

nobody needs to die

No people. Just Zionists and oligarchs. They opted out of humanity, and we do not have the context to make them human again. They are jor worth the effort or the damage they would do in the meantime, while they remain Zionists. Every single one needs to die.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Grotesque.

Succumbs compliant to Orwellian corruption of language.

Dehumanizes.

Vile.

Doubled down and did nearly all the things I just elaborated on how wrong they are. Over your totalitarianised head. Opposamed. Two wrongs don't make a right. You became them. An eye for and eye and a tooth for a tooth makes the whole world blind and toothless.

[Edit: Afterthought: Seems to play right into the ploys to have people be okay with killing them all. Y'know, like the crazy "christian" ploy to gather all the Jews in one place and have them convert to Christianity or drop the bomb on them all. How very Christian, hah! Beware the problem-reaction-solution ploys of these psychopaths and totalitarians. Always good to keep checking for what mass-formations we're each still in.]

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oooh advanced 'antisemitism!' play. Wondered where you were going with that.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago

Not sure what you're saying there, with that Orwellianised language.

But I suspect you're attempting to say I'm saying the opposite of what I'm saying.