this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
338 points (99.7% liked)

Space

1989 readers
26 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's also the issue with communicating with the satellite. Hard to do that with thousands of kilometers of rock in the way

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet, I can use satellites to communicate on the other side of the world. I have a suspicion the same system would work for this.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would require multiple additional satellites orbiting the Moon.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

So the only problem is money. This isn't an engineering issue, we've done this thousands of times. Unlike almost every other aspect of building a radio or optical observatory on the moon.