this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
462 points (98.9% liked)

News

35749 readers
2699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

😜 OK MAGA I brought some 🍿 to watch the mental gymnastics justifying her release.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoctorNope@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Ah, see, you think you heard that MAGA was going to “release the Epstein files” but what they actually said was “we’re going to release the Epstein pedophiles.” Yeah, they’re letting everyone involved with him off the hook.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

The Epstein 'philes

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can see this as an actual tactic. It means that do-gooders have to handle each and every one of the released, or be forced to focus on just one.

Considering the nature of MAGA, unleashing violent criminals upon the innocent remains in character. 😞

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It means that do-gooders have to handle each and every one of the released

Wait, where are the do-gooders?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And what meaningful action are Dems taking to stop it?

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Strongly worded letter SLAMMING them for corruption

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A firm email is being drafted.

(Epstein Island was a rare example of bipartisan effort)

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Rare?

Democrats have a pattern of vocally opposing issues only after they irreparably solidify them.

In 1986 they helped pass draconian drug laws and mandatory minimums that supercharged mass incarceration, then decades later turned around and branded the “war on drugs” a moral failure.

In 1994 they wrote and championed the crime bill that funded more cages and longer sentences; only once whole communities were gutted did it become fashionable for them to “reckon” with mass incarceration.

In 1996 they joined Republicans to “end welfare as we know it,” slapping work requirements and time limits on poor families, then years later started admitting it deepened extreme poverty.

That same ’90s crew pushed NAFTA and the broader free-trade consensus that helped ship industrial jobs overseas, then reinvented themselves as champions of the working class once the damage was locked in.

They joined in financial deregulation at the end of the decade, tearing down New Deal banking walls, and after the 2008 crash, suddenly discovered the virtues of regulation.

On social issues it’s the same story: they crafted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and passed DOMA, then only when public opinion flipped did they pretend they’d always been on the side of LGBT rights.

They voted for the 2002 Iraq AUMF and let Bush have his war, then spent the next decade calling it a catastrophic mistake.

They backed the 2006 Secure Fence Act to harden the southern border, then later denounced wall-style politics as cruel and nativist.

So no, Epstein Island wasn’t some weird one-off “bipartisan moment.” Bipartisanship is the rule whenever it comes to locking people up, bombing someone, cutting social supports, or serving corporate interests, and Democrats in particular have a long record of helping build the machinery first and only discovering their consciences after it’s too late to dismantle it. At least the Republicans consistently tell you they hate you to your face.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So your problem with Democrats is that they're capable of admitting they were wrong?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Nice twist.

My problem is that they're always on the wrong side of history, and only start using the vulnerable as rhetoric after they can't kill and maim them profitably.

They don't serve us, they use as to serve the capitalist class.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't get it. The minority party somehow has the power to do whatever they want; they just don't because they're exactly as bad as Republicans.

/S

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't really know what it is you're trying to say there, but perhaps you're unaware that the dems are the minority party in both the house and senate at the moment, and as such, they have insufficient voting power to counter that of the gop maga regime.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Democrats can't do anything. They don't have the capacity to accomplish anything useful. They're absolutely powerless.

That's why you should vote for them.