this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

4616 readers
493 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se
10
Are we repeating the telecoms crash with AI datacenters? (martinalderson.com)
submitted 4 months ago by rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Enterprises might discover that production agent deployments are harder than demos suggest. Hallucinations in high-stakes workflows, regulatory concerns around autonomous AI systems, or implementation complexity could slow adoption dramatically. If the agent future takes 5-7 years instead of 2-3, there's a painful gap where billions in infrastructure sits waiting for demand to catch up."

Yes. AI agents in infrastructure are a fundamentally stupid idea, at their very core.

Learn to write a bash script or pay someone competent to do it.

Almost no one needs a shittier solution that is 1000x faster to implement while 100x more likely to make profit-margin-evaporating mistakes.

Even the idiots calling the shots today are bound to notice this.

There's a third category of adoption to consider: "between 7 years and - let's not fucking do this, it is stupid"