this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
650 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

13965 readers
559 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please help keeping these monsters of our streets. It will save lives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Besides the obvious fact these trucks are too huge for European roads and parking spaces, America vehicles are simply hot garbage.

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Japanese and Korean vehicles for the American market aren't any better to be fair.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

the "newest" car i've ever owned is from 2008... are hondas and toyotas really equally as shitty as fucking dodge and chevy now?

[–] n4sdaq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think so. Their comment seems over-generalized. Sure, most modern cars are too "sporty" now which translates to being more uncomfortable in my experience. But that doesn't mean I'd lump Japanese cars in the same quality category as American cars.

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

I meant that they're all behemoths rather than quality wise! But yeah, Chevy has improved and is ok now from what I understand, the rest I wouldn't trust.

[–] Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 week ago

I too would like to know. I'm rocking a 2012 Scion with a Toyota engine with 300,000 miles on it...

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Toyota, particularly, hasn’t kept up with advances in infotainment technology. Their infotainment is literally no better than it was in 08. Honda infotainment is slightly better, but still stuck with terribly low resolution, and only a 9”ish screen. Pretty much any other company will be a better buy than those 2 right now. Remember, the infotainment in every new car is the entire heart of the car, so you’re forced to live with it; you can’t just swap out infotainment screens for something better like you used to be able to do.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Silly me, thinking that the engine would be the heart of a car.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

What would you even need that for?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

People today have no idea what engine they even have. They care more about the screen size in the interior.

Modern humans 🙄

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The engine is a part of the legs in this analogy

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

lol "heart of the car" gtfo

rear view cameras are nice (though unnecessary), but literally NOTHING else about "infotainment" is worth the extra cost. you think it is because you've been convinced you just simply can't survive without it, and cars can't even exist without it. why? because $$$

fuck outta my face with that shit

so, my takeaway from all this is that toyota is still the best way to go if you for some reason just have to buy a "infotainment" car

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What options are there that don't have infotainment garbage without buying something that's 10 years old?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I will not buy a car without a 15” screen. I just cannot read directions as fast on any smaller screen. The bigger the information on the screen, the faster I can read it, and the less precision I need with my gaze.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maps/navigation is the one feature that infotainment systems have that is a step up and worth a small amount of cost.

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Cell phone mount would work just fine...

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

It will be instantly outdated.

The phone you use is going to be a far better method of navigation. Cars need a dumb screen that connects to your phone and displays the map, problem solved. Although id take all screens out of cars but kids today need a screen or they freak out I guess.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do people actually want infotainment screens?

The only thing I can think of wanting a screen for is a backup camera. I much prefer buttons when possible. I thought infotainment screens were just a way for manufacturers to save money on buttons. Why would you want one? Is there something I'm missing?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The bigger the screen for me, the safer it is to gaze over at directions. I wouldn’t drive without directions telling me which way is fastest. No way can a human predict traffic better than computers.

The cameras might not be “required” to drive, but they do increase precision, which in turn is safer overall.

Also, the last thing I wanna do is know my area super well, then it takes the excitement out of driving around; the engagement is helpful to keep me from being distracted.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If cars were designed so you actually had visibility, you wouldn't Need 500 cameras just to reverse.

This is why 2000s was peak. You had most creature comforts, and tech wasn't shoved in our faces, and you could actually see out of your car.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cameras allow you to see 360° all at the same time, though.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Sure, but not in snow or rain, and they break.

I prefer just turning my head!

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How do you like to get to new places? Turn by turn audio? That mixed with on-screen directions?

If you like on screen, what is the ideal screen size?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

12” widescreen is basically my minimum; >15” is ideal. I’d put a 24” in my car if I could.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Like a driving simulator :D

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@brbposting @Taldan Reading a paper map and looking up directions before you drive and then remembering them are critical skills that should be on driving tests.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Makes me feel better doing that!

Still have to check traffic even for short trips since I refuse to waste half an hour in a jam when looking for green/red roads would’ve taken seconds :) then appreciate traffic notifications along the way

Admittedly don’t do it with paper but have enjoyed learning roads - even played a game kinda, work to home (San Francisco) where I turned right on red for each red I got, forcing me to explore new places (no GPS)

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

Agreed.

Having a maps app that shows directions and current position is pretty handy in new areas, especially if there is construction or heavy traffic to avoid.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 week ago

9 inch infotainment is plenty. The purpose of a car is to travel, not watch SpongeBob Squarepants.

Infotainment replacements are out there, but often lack support for some specific vehicle options. If the connections were more standardized like the old radios it would certainly be nice.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hate infotainment and technology in cars so, go Toyota!

Give me efi and maybe abs (most of my cars dont have abs anyway)

Tech Junk makes all cars more expensive and prone to failure and impossible to repair, and further pushes us to technofacist dystopia where your every move is recorded and your car can be controlled remotely (Tesla can do this already).

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No. They're much more reliable and generally cheaper even with the tariffs

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Sorry, I meant that they're all too huge for European roads. Quality wise it varies considerably, Chevy group has kind of stepped it up and honda/the Koreans have slipped (though miles better than Stellantis group with Dodge and jeep still).

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Their trucks are. And SUVs.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago

Only some places in Europe have roads too small to accomodate them, but regardless, these vehicles are stupid everywhere