this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
228 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

915 readers
110 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cannibalkitteh@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This squicks me out a bit. It paints the desirable outcome as masculine and misogyny being solely the purview of men.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I took it as an affirmation that being a feminist doesn’t make you less of a man. Instead of phrasing it as a double negative “it’s not unmanly to call out misogyny…” they went with the simpler but potentially misleading phrasing in the screenshot.

[–] cannibalkitteh@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think perhaps I'm taking a less charitable view of the phrasing than I could. I just tend to bristle a bit at what feels like gender proscriptive phrasing. "Stand against mysogny, even if nobody is watching." would be more inclusive.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Your criticism is completely reasonable, if the author didn’t meant to be proscriptive a change in wording would help them get their message across. As it is, there’s a lot of room for interpretation!

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not a fan either. Turning the mechanism of toxic masculinity towards a good cause doesn't make the mechanism good, and risks reinforcing the mechanism. Standing up against misogyny is something that all people should do regardless of gender.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well assuming no non binary people because OOP is too basic to comprehend them; it's not like women can accurately call that shit out when we're not looking.

Edit: except gender flipped zatoichi. Obviously.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree with the message that men should call out misogyny when women are not present, just not with the delivery which preys upon and perpetuates insecurities that men have about their masculinity. They are valid in their masculinity whether or not they are a good person, and being a good person should be the motivation, not insecurity.

Okay but if you're not preying on insecurities you're just bad at gender. Had you considered this?