this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
289 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

14041 readers
270 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Munich has some issues dealing with too many cars and illegal parking on the sidewalk is common.

The SPD mayor has the solution: change the law so that this rude habit becomes legal.

And what about pedestrians, people with wheelchair, strollers? I guess they'll have to adapt.

Fuck cars!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It would be nice if the sidewalks were extended in width to fully accommodate a full car and a fully clear 1.8m sidewalk width at minimum.

This would mean if someone does not park their car, then the sidewalk becomes larger for everyone else to enjoy.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

First of all there's probably no space for sidewalks this wide on both sides plus a street unless you want to demolish a lot of houses. And second do you really think it wouldn't be constantly used as parking and therefore never be usable as a sidewalk?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never implied to demo homes or change setbacks, the idea would be to narrow the street to one actual car width as opposed to 2 or three car widths, extending the sidewalk width into the street.

This has a added benefit as if the street needs repaving you only need to spend money on repaving of one car lane width, as opposed to 2 or 3 car widths on a single lane street.

And now what happens is if a car is not parked that space becomes usable to a pedestrian to cross at or walk on.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

The article is about cars parking on the sidewalk because the streets are already narrow. These are usually two way streets with effectively a single lane for both directions.