this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
510 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

27913 readers
750 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The name of the format makes me think it's regular jpeg, but bigger. Wouldn't it be better to be smaller? ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] Cort@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

No. They increased the max "canvas" size and increased encoding efficiency. You'd want the file size to be smaller but the file itself to be larger (and consequently more detailed)

[โ€“] bhamlin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's even more confusing than that; the X is for revision 10, and the L is for long term.

It's an update to the JPEG standard intended to cover expected future uses and capabilities.

[โ€“] Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[โ€“] Sunrosa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In my personal tests of jxl, it manages filesizes 1/9th that of png while remaining visually identical (unless looking VERY closely). It's a massive improvement over jpeg and honestly a replacement for png in most cases.

Like I'm saying 8MB for a 8000x6000 file at max quality (estimating from memory)