this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
108 points (65.7% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8302 readers
38 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There’s a clear campaign against the mentally ill with the global rise of fascism. Lots of it shows up in anti homeless rhetoric, but you can see it in the MAHA and anti vaccination movements.

There’s no reason to use the word “r-tarded” to describe someone. As someone who’s worked with the intellectually challenged, it’s an insult to them to compare them with people who are willfully ignorant.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

slurs are useful.

they are an escalation step that are words instead of physical violence.

making slurs illegals removes that step and leads the escalation straight to violence.

That is an unpopular opinion.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

At no point has the suggestion been that saying slurs should be illegal. It’s that if you say slurs, you are a shitty person.

Also - this is probably the most sociopathic and scary take on this thread. People say slurs rather than do violence, so we shouldn’t be concerned with people saying slurs? My understanding is that slurs are more often then not preludes to violence.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not trying to be a troll. I just genuinely don't understand why sociopathic is acceptable as an adjective and retarded is not. Can you explain the difference?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

“Sociopath” is not a diagnosis for a mental illness or disability. It is a word describing behavior hostile to others. There is no systemic discrimination against people labeled as “sociopaths.”

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Using terms like sociopath to describe someone is worse than a slur. It pseudo-intellectual cowardice to use that rather than saying that you think someone is crazy or more directly retarded.

I think that if you remove pathways that are non-violent, like name-calling, then that makes a more direct path to violence. And NAZIs have shown that violence is inevitable in history.

And hate speech is a crime in many places.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"Oh noo if I can't say slurs then I have to just attack the ni-"

You gotta get past this phase bro

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And you gotta see the Black Mirror episode, "Arkangel", bro. Cause it's obvious you haven't.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"The TV show told me I was right bro"

I've seen all of black mirror. -_-

You gotta grow up

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Problem with your argument is that Black Mirror has been shockingly accurate with its predictions. Just watch the episode "Be Right Back" if you don't believe. It came out in 2013, and is disturbingly accurate with predicting LLMs becoming reality. Or the episode "Joan is Awful", which predicts AI-generated video.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are now spitefully developing a worldview that is dependent on fiction.

Get a grip lmao

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What the fuck kind of logic is this? We can't magically make insulting language go away. If someone wants to use a slur, they will. People also don't think "damn, if I didn't have a word to insult this person that was insulting enough I'd punch them!" If people want to be violent they're going to be violent.