this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
687 points (98.3% liked)

News

35724 readers
3292 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/58347995

BOYCOTT NIKE!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't repair shoes, but I work in a place that sells them and I know exactly what you mean. They're shit. Adidas are the better of the big 2 brands.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How does Puma rate in comparison?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pumas last forever in my experience.

I also like to get them over Adidas since that was the one of the two brothers who was not a literal Nazi

IMO Puma do the best quality gear out of the major sportswear brands, and they're usually amongst the cheapest. I find most of their shoes a bit ugly, but I do like the Palermos.

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anecdotal, but I just replaced my favorite pair of Pumas, which were at least 12 years old. Granted I didn't wear them every single day, but at least 2 or 3 days a week for 12 years is pretty good in my book. I've had to replace Adidas sooner than that with less wear, but they still last pretty long and I'll confidently buy both brands. I'd never buy Nike (and wouldn't wear most Nikes either honestly, just not my personal taste in style)

For some reference, here's a picture of maybe 2/3 of my shoes, many of which are Pumas. There's also a couple pairs of Keds in there, but they're more recent and I don't know yet how they hold up long term comparatively

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hey, I am also a fan of rotating my shoes. They do seem to last longer that way and are more useful over a longer period of time. I still have Pumas from years ago. They start as my indoor workout shoes, then they are the outdoor casuals, then outdoor workers. I move them to dirtier duty over time. My oldest pair (~15yrs) are on dog-poop duty and now never come inside, but they are about to retire permanently. The hole in the side is now letting in too much moisture so my sock gets soaked. They've been good pooper troopers!

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Definitely like Adidas better than most

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As someone with wide feet, Nike seems to be the only one making shoes that even fit my feet. There's been numerous Adidas shoes that I wanted to get but the fit is just way too narrow.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look at Keen or Altra. No idea on the ethicality of either of those though. At this point, I assume all companies are evil unless proven otherwise and try to pay attention and remember when they are evil.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Cool, I'll check them out. Thanks for the recommendations.