They spend this whole article suggesting 'Ms Keating' has been untoward in her dealings, with seemingly no reply to the specific reason she was at Epstein's. Leave that up to the reader's imagination.

While the email exchange and 'X' symbol they focus on seems to have been part of her promoting Paul Keating's book? So the 'x' isn't a personal gesture directed for only Epstein, which they glaze over in their rapidity to highlight her personal ties. At no point does it seem they have asked Ms Keating to respond to the article itself.

Then they mention three others, who just so happen to be three Republicans/supporters, had meetings planned, hastening to add,

(There is no confirmation these meetings ever happened nor any suggestion of wrongdoing on any of their parts.)

The point of this article is to take the opportunity to compare involvement by degrees in order to whitewash their pals ties with the paedo.

Whats the impression left of Ms Keating compared to the other three? We all know how the powerful cunts are gona make this go, enemies and expendables go down, while the in-group, names redacted and protected. As usual.

Fuck justice in this world is so unevenly distributed through the lense of whoever is in power. This is exactly what separation of powers needs to prevent but wealthy cliques and factionalism, it seems, are all too welcome to run roughshod over the laws and visions of their respective country's. How long can this go on? Forever? Probably.