this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
626 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14037 readers
227 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 30 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The best electric busses have electric lines overhead, so you don't need big batteries.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It’s never enough for you people.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

People love to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. They oppose incremental progress and preserve the status quo as a result.

[–] Lag@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Everything converges into either crabs or trains.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not about being enough. Battery powered busses are very expensive and baterries need replacement and maintenance. Trolley buses are a cheaper investment in the long term. So it's frustrating when new projects choose baterry buses instead of trolley buses. It always feels like corruption to me.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Trolley are better in a lot of cases, but not in all of the cases.

[–] Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

Trolley busses are also much better for steep inclines!

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

A lot less versatile and a lot more disruptive to the community.

Not entirely against them but I dont have them a the gold standard.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Then you need to cable all the roads of bits networks. That seems expensive. Incidentally the tram line my city is building will be battery powered for part of its route, as they're not allowed to string pantograph wires in one area. It's mostly on wires

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 4 weeks ago

The cost is wayyyy less than letting cars on the road. And continuing the climate catastrophe

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

It may seem expensive now but long term it pays off by having to not replace batteries as well as many external factors that good transit provides. I find the bigger pushback against overhead wires is how they look.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kinda hard to do that in the suburbs.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Strong disagree. If you have telephone poles by the road, the power is already there

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Power poles in the suburbs here (Canberra) run along back fences, they only exist near the road where they cross a road

Sydney might be able to hang wires over the road from it's power poles; no idea if the poles are up to it

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago

Of course they need to install overhead lines. But the power is already there. That's the hardest part

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No telephone poles anywhere near my house. Only along main roads at least 30 mins walk away.

All the household electrical wiring, internet, cable TV, telephone, natural gas, and water services are underground.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So yeah...power is already there

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah and it’ll cost millions to tear up the roads and install overhead wires for the bus, just to service 1 neighbourhood out of hundreds, where hardly anyone uses public transit as it is.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

hardly anyone uses public transit as it is

Well, that's kind of the problem we're trying to fix here

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There are lots of people who use public transit in my city, they just don’t live in the suburbs.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Well, that's kind of another problem we're trying to fix here

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. They need to tear up next to the road to install power poles
  2. No one uses public transport only when it's the worst option. In my town public transport is cheaper than parking and only a little slower than driving so a large share of commuters use public transport. Yours must be expensive or inconvenient or uncomfortable
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They’d have to tear down all the tall trees in the neighbourhood to make room for the power poles. There’s no way in hell the car-centric folks who live here would approve of that!

When you walk down the sidewalk around my street you walk in the shade of these trees most of the time. Replacing those trees with ugly power poles and overhead wires would ruin the character of the neighbourhood.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Quite so. Catenary wires work best in dense areas

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't you realize how much it will cost us to not do that?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not weakness, that is life.”

― Jean-Luc Picard

Sometimes we get stuck in local extrema. The biggest challenge facing the human race is not climate change, it’s collective action. Simply put, we’re unable to cooperate effectively enough on a large scale to be able to deal with these sorts of problems.

My city could invest billions of dollars in building a fully electric streetcar transit network and climate change could still proceed largely unabated due to the actions of other people in other areas. In that scenario, my city ends up losing because climate change happened and we wasted all that money on a system that didn’t stop climate change. This is the worse possible outcome so the rational thing (on an individual level, see game theory) to do is avoid it by doing nothing.

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

But.. But think about the battery megacorps!