Church of Thighentology

1275 readers

63 users here now

For lovers of all things anime thighs. Thick, thin, or in between; all are welcome here.

Posts must feature legs or thighs. The thickness or focus doesn't matter as long as they are present
Lewd/Ecchi is fine, but please mark NSFW as needed
Include source in body if possible.
No AI generated content.

Find other anime communities which may interest you: Here---

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

severalkittens@ani.social

Severalkittens@lemmy.world

Jill Valentine (by Prywinko) (infosec.pub)

submitted 4 months ago by MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz to c/thighdeology@ani.social

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Full quality: .jpg 1 MB (1000 × 1500)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ok.

But apparently what you do look for, are opportunities to comment unfounded suspiciouns, which you could have disproven by opening any single one of the links in the very same post.

That's not investigative journalism. That's the bare minimum.

Otherwise you risk spreading your suspiciouns to everyone just as lazy as you. And you are lazy.

Writing that comment required more effort than checking the date of the work using one of the provided links. And that's before considering that verifying a thought before voicing is basic common sense. Instead you left a comment that is a literal request for others to do this for you.

[+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We should normalize asking if something uses AI

In a community that forbids it?

we should normalize tagging art as AI-free.

In... In a communtiy that forbids AI?

Asking is fine.

But you didn't bring up anything unclear. You asked if water was wet, while standing in some.

By all means if something raises an eyebrow and the sources don't back it up, look into it. But you didn't do that.

All you did was essentially go "this is sus" on something that 100% wasn't, and then drop the mic.

And when told you could have just answered the question yourself, you instantly cry "too much effort".

[+] finitebanjo@piefed.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't have a problem with you asking.

I have problem with your "others can put in the effort" attitude.

My initial reply is essentially little more than a reply to your question.

Only once you straight up went "I'm not some investigative journalist" when all you had to do was open a fucking link, did I take issue.